From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Theodore Ts'o Subject: Re: [PATCH] resize2fs: don't require fsck to print min size Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2014 19:12:06 -0500 Message-ID: <20141215001206.GS29787@thunk.org> References: <5488649C.8020809@sandeen.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: ext4 development To: Eric Sandeen Return-path: Received: from imap.thunk.org ([74.207.234.97]:55732 "EHLO imap.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750939AbaLOAMJ (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Dec 2014 19:12:09 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5488649C.8020809@sandeen.net> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 09:19:56AM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: > My previous change ended up requiring that the filesystem > be fsck'd after the last mount, even if we are only querying > the minimum size. This is a bit draconian, and it burned > the Fedora installer, which wants to calculate minimum size > for every filesystem in the box at install time, which in turn > requires a full fsck of every filesystem. > > Try this one more time, and separate out the tests to make things > a bit more clear. If we're only printing the min size, don't > require the fsck, as this is a bit less dangerous/critical. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen Applied with a minor whitespace fixup, thanks. - Ted