* [PATCH ext4] ext4 crypto: ext4_fname_decrypt() can be static
2015-01-16 2:27 [ext4:crypto 15/21] fs/ext4/crypto_fname.c:322:5: sparse: symbol 'ext4_fname_decrypt' was not declared. Should it be static? kbuild test robot
@ 2015-01-16 2:27 ` kbuild test robot
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: kbuild test robot @ 2015-01-16 2:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Halcrow
Cc: kbuild-all, Theodore Ts'o, Uday Savagaonkar, Ildar Muslukhov,
Andreas Dilger, linux-ext4, linux-kernel
fs/ext4/crypto_fname.c:322:5: sparse: symbol 'ext4_fname_decrypt' was not declared. Should it be static?
fs/ext4/crypto_fname.c:380:5: sparse: symbol 'ext4_fname_encode_digest' was not declared. Should it be static?
fs/ext4/crypto_fname.c:479:6: sparse: symbol 'ext4_free_fname_crypto_ctx' was not declared. Should it be static?
fs/ext4/crypto_fname.c:532:30: sparse: symbol 'ext4_alloc_fname_crypto_ctx' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
---
crypto_fname.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/crypto_fname.c b/fs/ext4/crypto_fname.c
index e1a72d1..4b4b507 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/crypto_fname.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/crypto_fname.c
@@ -319,7 +319,7 @@ static int ext4_fname_encrypt(struct ext4_fname_crypto_ctx *ctx,
* Errors are returned as negative numbers.
* We trust the caller to allocate sufficient memory to oname string.
*/
-int ext4_fname_decrypt(struct ext4_fname_crypto_ctx *ctx,
+static int ext4_fname_decrypt(struct ext4_fname_crypto_ctx *ctx,
struct ext4_cstr *oname,
const struct ext4_cstr *iname)
{
@@ -377,7 +377,7 @@ int ext4_fname_decrypt(struct ext4_fname_crypto_ctx *ctx,
* Encodes the input digest using characters from the set [a-zA-Z0-9_+].
* The encoded string is roughly 4/3 times the size of the input string.
*/
-int ext4_fname_encode_digest(char *dst, char *src, u32 len)
+static int ext4_fname_encode_digest(char *dst, char *src, u32 len)
{
static const char *lookup_table =
"abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ0123456789_+";
@@ -476,7 +476,7 @@ out:
*
* Frees up a crypto context.
*/
-void ext4_free_fname_crypto_ctx(struct ext4_fname_crypto_ctx *ctx)
+static void ext4_free_fname_crypto_ctx(struct ext4_fname_crypto_ctx *ctx)
{
if (ctx == NULL || IS_ERR(ctx))
return;
@@ -529,7 +529,7 @@ static struct ext4_fname_crypto_ctx *ext4_search_fname_crypto_ctx(
/**
* ext4_alloc_fname_crypto_ctx() -
*/
-struct ext4_fname_crypto_ctx *ext4_alloc_fname_crypto_ctx(
+static struct ext4_fname_crypto_ctx *ext4_alloc_fname_crypto_ctx(
const struct ext4_encryption_key *key)
{
struct ext4_fname_crypto_ctx *ctx;
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread