From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Cc: Jan Mrazek <email@honzamrazek.cz>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, trivial@kernel.org,
Jiri Slaby <gep@mail.muni.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix of coding style
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 12:27:09 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150120172709.GB24217@thunk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54BE4C0B.3030703@suse.cz>
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 01:37:31PM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 01/20/2015, 12:59 PM, Jan Mrazek wrote:
> > - init_timer changed to setup_timer
> > - multiline strings changed to single line (so it can be greped)
> > - other small conding style changes
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jan Mrazek <email@honzamrazek.cz>
>
> Note that one hunk does not apply cleanly here:
> Hunk #35 succeeded at 3581 with fuzz 1 (offset 16 lines).
>
> What tree did you use as a base? Care to rebase?
>
> Reviewed-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
>
> (There is a nit: leaving up to the maintainers if they insist on
> separating the setup_timer change or not :).)
Yes, please separate it out; in general I'm not terribly excited about
these sorts of massive cleanup patches, because it breaks patches that
other people send me. (I'll also note that many of the multi-line
separations happened people running checkpatch sent me cleanup
patches; so the fact that I'm now getting a cleanup patch to reverse
this also predisposes me to not be very receptive to these sorts of
cleanups. I will generally ask developers to send me checkpatch clean
patches, but I'm less enthusiastic about cleanup patches for their own
sake.)
That being said, the setup_timer change is small, and less disruptive,
so separating that out is good because I will likely accept the
setup_timer change, but probably not the multi-line string change,
since regardless of what you base it against, there is a very good
chance it won't apply against the ext4 development tree --- and if it
does, it will likely break other patches that people send me.
Cheers,
- Ted
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-20 17:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-20 11:59 [PATCH] Fix of coding style Jan Mrazek
2015-01-20 12:37 ` Jiri Slaby
2015-01-20 17:27 ` Theodore Ts'o [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150120172709.GB24217@thunk.org \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=email@honzamrazek.cz \
--cc=gep@mail.muni.cz \
--cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trivial@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).