linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Cc: Nikhilesh Reddy <reddyn@codeaurora.org>, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Writes blocked on wait_for_stable_page (Writes of less than page size sometimes take too long)
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2015 21:37:23 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150201023723.GB3070@thunk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150128235705.GI21455@birch.djwong.org>

On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 03:57:05PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> Yes, that wait_for_page_writeback() was replaced with a call to
> wait_for_stable_page() upstream, so it'll probably work for your 3.10
> kernel.
> 
> (I also wonder why not jump to a newer LTS kernel, but that's neither
> here nor there.)

Nikhilesh said that he was using a 64-bit android device.  I'm going
to guess it is based off of the AOSP kernel for the Nexus 9, which is
a 64-bit android device that uses 3.10 as a base.  It's not *really* a
3.10 kernel, though, becausre it looks like bits and pieces of the VFS
was forward ported to a somewhat newer version so they could backport
F2FS to the Nexus 9 kernel.  But I'm guessing he's using it because
there are device drivers he needs that might not be available without
a lot of forward-porting work on a newer kernel.

If you are interested in trying to use a somewhat newer version of
ext4, I just *happen* to have a backport of the 3.18 version of ext4
on top of a stock version of 3.10.  You can find it at the
backport-to-3.10 branch of the ext4.git tree on git.kernel.org.

If you are starting from the AOSP version of the Nexus 9 kernel, the
patch series from that branch won't apply 100% cleanly, because of the
changes resulting from the F2FS backport.  It's relatively
straight-forward though to use the backport-to-3.10 patch series as a
model to get a version of 3.18 ext4 on top of the AOSP kernel, though;
it's mostly dropping or reworking patches that were no longer
necessary thanks to the F2FS backport.

If there is interest, I can look into what might be involved in making
a git repo of an AOSP kernel with the 3.18 ext4 code backported to it
available.

I won't give any warrantees, of course, since the AOSP kernel doesn't
build on x86 and so I can't easily run regression tests on it.  So if
it breaks, you will get to keep both pieces.  I will try to at least
look at bug reports, though, and I can say that 3.18 backport on the
stock 3.10 kernel survives xfstests much better than the 3.10 version
of ext4, since a modern xfstests very quickly caused the stock 3.10
kernel to panic.  :-)

						- Ted
						

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-02-01  2:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-28 18:58 Writes blocked on wait_for_stable_page (Writes of less than page size sometimes take too long) Nikhilesh Reddy
2015-01-28 19:27 ` Nikhilesh Reddy
2015-01-28 21:39   ` Darrick J. Wong
2015-01-28 23:23     ` Nikhilesh Reddy
2015-01-28 23:36       ` Nikhilesh Reddy
2015-01-28 23:57         ` Darrick J. Wong
2015-01-30 21:25           ` Nikhilesh Reddy
2015-01-30 21:53             ` Darrick J. Wong
2015-02-01  2:37           ` Theodore Ts'o [this message]
2015-02-03 23:51             ` Nikhilesh Reddy
2015-02-04 17:02               ` Theodore Ts'o

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150201023723.GB3070@thunk.org \
    --to=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=reddyn@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).