From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][request for stable 3.10 inclusion] ext4 CVE-2014-8086
Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 16:51:56 +0800
Message-ID: <20150207085156.GA20290@kroah.com>
References: <54D31F09.4010401@huawei.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, dmonakhov@openvz.org,
	sasha.levin@oracle.com, tytso@mit.edu
To: hujianyang <hujianyang@huawei.com>
Return-path: <linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:59101 "EHLO
	mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1758705AbbBGRII (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>); Sat, 7 Feb 2015 12:08:08 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <54D31F09.4010401@huawei.com>
Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org>

On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 03:43:05PM +0800, hujianyang wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> The following patch commit a41537e69b4aa43f0fea02498c2595a81267383b
> 
> ext4: prevent bugon on race between write/fcntl
> 
> fix CVE-2014-8086 in upstream kernel. I wish you could merge this fix
> into stable 3.10. Since refactoring in ext4, the sending patch is quite
> different from the patch in upstream kernel.

Before I do that, can you also provide a backport to the 3.14-stable
kernel tree so that we don't have that tree missing this?

thanks,

greg k-h