linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
Cc: adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ext4: WARNING: CPU: 10 PID: 23340 at fs/block_dev.c
Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2015 16:27:36 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150409202736.GA13705@thunk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55269891.3050709@oracle.com>

On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 11:19:45AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> 
> Nope, I just got new servers to play with and decided to try xfstests.
> 
> I can try bisection if it doesn't sound familiar, but since it's metal
> servers it'll take a while.

It's in the "dangerous" group, which may very well mean that it's
known to cause systems to crash.  In general I tend to run either
"check -g quick" as a smoke test, or "check -g auto" with a variety of
different ext4 configurations.  The former takes about 30 minuts, and
the latter (given my current list of test configs) takes a bit under
24 hours.

I tried manually running generic/019, and even though I have
CONFIG_FAIL_MAKE_REQUEST defined, /sys/kernel/debug/fail_make_request
isn't present, and so the test complains that I haven't compiled it
into my kernel --- even though /proc/config.gz confirms that it is
enabled.

Is there anything special I have to do to get generic/019 to run?

Thanks,

					- Ted

P.S.  I have provided for ext4 developers are preconfigured kvm test
image that makes it very easy to do tests without needing to use bare
metal; let me know if you're interested in getting a quick start to
our setup.

  reply	other threads:[~2015-04-09 20:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-04-09 14:14 ext4: WARNING: CPU: 10 PID: 23340 at fs/block_dev.c Sasha Levin
2015-04-09 15:17 ` Theodore Ts'o
2015-04-09 15:19   ` Sasha Levin
2015-04-09 20:27     ` Theodore Ts'o [this message]
2015-04-09 20:49       ` Sasha Levin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150409202736.GA13705@thunk.org \
    --to=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sasha.levin@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).