linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: walter harms <wharms@bfs.de>, Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>,
	Michael Halcrow <mhalcrow@google.com>,
	Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] ext4 crypto: testing the wrong variable
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2015 09:48:11 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150411134811.GI6540@thunk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150408122251.GJ10964@mwanda>

On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 03:22:51PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > why test *buf == NULL ? xfree() can handle this.
> > 
> > the question is do programm depend on *buf=NULL.
> > In case of IS_ERR(*buf) *buf will be left unchanged
> > and later prgramms may things there is a buffer
> > available ?
> 
> Good point.  That IS_ERR() check is going to cause all kinds of future
> bugs.

Yes, it's not needed at all, so I'll just remove it.  I'm also going
to be fixing the whole fname_crypto_alloc_buffer() and
fname_crypto_free_buffer() so the calling convention isn't as
horrendous.  So basically, instead of

int ext4_fname_crypto_alloc_buffer(struct ext4_fname_crypto_ctx *ctx,
				   unsigned char **obuf, u32 *olen, u32 ilen);
void ext4_fname_crypto_free_buffer(void **buf);

it will be:

int ext4_fname_crypto_alloc_buffer(struct ext4_fname_crypto_ctx *ctx,
				   struct ext4_str *crypto_str, u32 ilen);
void ext4_fname_crypto_free_buffer(struct ext4_str *crypto_str);

(And BTW, this isn't appropriate for kernel-janitors since this code
isn't upstream yet)

							- Ted

  reply	other threads:[~2015-04-11 13:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-04-08  8:53 [patch] ext4 crypto: testing the wrong variable Dan Carpenter
2015-04-08  9:51 ` Julia Lawall
2015-04-08 11:51   ` walter harms
2015-04-08 12:22     ` Dan Carpenter
2015-04-11 13:48       ` Theodore Ts'o [this message]
2015-04-15  9:26         ` Dan Carpenter
2015-04-08 18:15 ` Andreas Dilger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150411134811.GI6540@thunk.org \
    --to=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=julia.lawall@lip6.fr \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhalcrow@google.com \
    --cc=wharms@bfs.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).