linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Anssi Hannula <anssi.hannula@iki.fi>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Michael Halcrow <mhalcrow@google.com>
Subject: Re: ext4 crypto: Do not select from EXT4_FS_ENCRYPTION
Date: Sun, 3 May 2015 13:53:20 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150503175320.GI10014@thunk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <554615C6.1060107@iki.fi>

On Sun, May 03, 2015 at 03:34:14PM +0300, Anssi Hannula wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> 01.05.2015, 03:18, Herbert Xu kirjoitti:
> > This patch adds a tristate EXT4_ENCRYPTION to do the selections
> > for EXT4_FS_ENCRYPTION because selecting from a bool causes all
> > the selected options to be built-in, even if EXT4 itself is a
> > module.
> 
> Hmm, are you sure?
> 
> Since CONFIG_EXT4_FS_ENCRYPTION itself depends on CONFIG_EXT4_FS, the
> selector for the selected options becomes (CONFIG_EXT4_FS_ENCRYPTION &&
> CONFIG_EXT4_FS && CONFIG_BLOCK).
> 
> Per my testing on git master (without this patch), if EXT4_FS=m and
> EXT4_FS_ENCRYPTION=y, both "built-in" and "module" options are allowed
> for the selected options (checked CONFIG_ENCRYPTED_KEYS myself).

I believe the situation which is causing concern is when someone wants
to build a kernel where EXT4_FS=y, but they want the cryptographic
algorithms to be modules.  In that case, since EXT4_FS_ENCRYPTION is
'y', it forces the all of the crypto modules to be built into the
kernel, and so it forecloses that option from someone who is building
or packaging a kernel.

	       		   	     - Ted

  reply	other threads:[~2015-05-03 17:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-01  0:18 ext4 crypto: Do not select from EXT4_FS_ENCRYPTION Herbert Xu
2015-05-02 13:40 ` Theodore Ts'o
2015-05-03 12:34 ` Anssi Hannula
2015-05-03 17:53   ` Theodore Ts'o [this message]
2015-05-03 18:29     ` Anssi Hannula
2015-05-03 21:11       ` Theodore Ts'o
2015-05-04  1:00         ` Herbert Xu
2015-05-04  1:37           ` Theodore Ts'o

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150503175320.GI10014@thunk.org \
    --to=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=anssi.hannula@iki.fi \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhalcrow@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).