From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Xiaoguang Wang <wangxg.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: issue WARN_ON_ONCE() if page gets truncated in ext4_write_[da_]begin()
Date: Sun, 17 May 2015 13:51:18 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150517175118.GI4489@thunk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1430990243-8568-1-git-send-email-wangxg.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
On Thu, May 07, 2015 at 05:17:23PM +0800, Xiaoguang Wang wrote:
> In ext4_write_[da_]begin(), when we get a page successfully by calling
> grab_cache_page_write_begin(), then unless this page is truncated by
> ext4_truncate_failed_write(), which is called when ext4_write_[da_]begin()
> run into some errors, otherwise I think this page won't be truncated by
> other kernel path because we're holding i_mutex.
>
> In this patch, if page is truncated by ext4_truncate_failed_write(), then
> we just put it and call grab_cache_page_write_begin() again to get a new
> page, then this check 'if (page->mapping != mapping)' won't be necessary.
> We can remove this check, but according to Jan Kara's suggestion, we issue
> WARN_ON_ONCE() here if page is truncated, that means something is wrong.
> (Thanks to Jan Kara for his help)
It would be helpful if the commit description explained why this
change is a benefit. There's a very detailed explanation about why
it's safe, but why do we need to release the page only to try again to
grab it by jumping to retry_grab instead of retry_journal? What
problem are you trying to solve?
Thanks, regards,
- Ted
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-17 17:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-07 9:17 [PATCH] ext4: issue WARN_ON_ONCE() if page gets truncated in ext4_write_[da_]begin() Xiaoguang Wang
2015-05-17 17:51 ` Theodore Ts'o [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150517175118.GI4489@thunk.org \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wangxg.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).