* Re: fuse2fs
[not found] <EA601C64-3B42-4FA7-A572-6BD07443AEE1@lovstrand.com>
@ 2015-11-21 14:10 ` Theodore Ts'o
2015-11-23 20:49 ` fuse2fs Darrick J. Wong
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Theodore Ts'o @ 2015-11-21 14:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lennart Lövstrand; +Cc: linux-ext4, darrick.wong
Hi Lennart,
Apologies for the delay in getting back to you. Things have been very
busy this past month, and your e-mail slipped between the cracks.
> I got it to compile under OS X 10.11 with a few minor tweaks, but
> when testing it, I noticed pretty quickly that I couldn't create new
> files. I tracked it down to the UID & GID fields not being set on
> new inodes. This caused them to be owned by root in op_create, which
> in turn made its call to __op_open fail since it couldn't open the
> file as the current user, which in turn made op_create fail (even
> though the file actually was created). It seems like such a simple
> and obvious error that I'm surprised it's there and it makes me
> wonder if this code really has been used in read/write mode to any
> large extent.
>
> Could you advise? I notice that it's marked with "Copyright
> Oracle", so I'm assuming it was contributed by someone else and not
> actually your own code.
Yes, if you had checked the git logs, you would have seen that Darrick
contributed the code.
It looks like op_create is missing a call to set the inode uid/gid
from the fuse_context's uid/gid fields, but I'm not an expert on FUSE;
Darrick should be able to comment more intelligently on your bug
report.
> BTW, if I were to create a decent .fs package for OS X, would you be
> interested in making it part of the e2fsprogs source, or do you
> think it would be better to make it a separate distribution? What
> kind of attribution would you like me to put into it in that case?
> My intent would be to distribute it freely & openly, of course.
I'm not sure what a ".fs package" is. Is this some kind of spec file
ala the RPM spec file or the debian dpkg files that are used to
build a package? If so, sure, we could put something like that in the
contrib directory along with directions of how to build a new OSX
package from source.
Cheers,
- Ted
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: fuse2fs
2015-11-21 14:10 ` fuse2fs Theodore Ts'o
@ 2015-11-23 20:49 ` Darrick J. Wong
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Darrick J. Wong @ 2015-11-23 20:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Theodore Ts'o; +Cc: Lennart Lövstrand, linux-ext4
On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 09:10:13AM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> Hi Lennart,
>
> Apologies for the delay in getting back to you. Things have been very
> busy this past month, and your e-mail slipped between the cracks.
>
> > I got it to compile under OS X 10.11 with a few minor tweaks, but
> > when testing it, I noticed pretty quickly that I couldn't create new
> > files. I tracked it down to the UID & GID fields not being set on
> > new inodes. This caused them to be owned by root in op_create, which
> > in turn made its call to __op_open fail since it couldn't open the
> > file as the current user, which in turn made op_create fail (even
> > though the file actually was created). It seems like such a simple
> > and obvious error that I'm surprised it's there and it makes me
> > wonder if this code really has been used in read/write mode to any
> > large extent.
So far it's only been used as root...
...in any case, you're correct that op_create fails to set uid/gid on
the new inode. Will send out a patch shortly; thank you for reporting
this!
--D
> >
> > Could you advise? I notice that it's marked with "Copyright
> > Oracle", so I'm assuming it was contributed by someone else and not
> > actually your own code.
>
> Yes, if you had checked the git logs, you would have seen that Darrick
> contributed the code.
>
> It looks like op_create is missing a call to set the inode uid/gid
> from the fuse_context's uid/gid fields, but I'm not an expert on FUSE;
> Darrick should be able to comment more intelligently on your bug
> report.
>
> > BTW, if I were to create a decent .fs package for OS X, would you be
> > interested in making it part of the e2fsprogs source, or do you
> > think it would be better to make it a separate distribution? What
> > kind of attribution would you like me to put into it in that case?
> > My intent would be to distribute it freely & openly, of course.
>
> I'm not sure what a ".fs package" is. Is this some kind of spec file
> ala the RPM spec file or the debian dpkg files that are used to
> build a package? If so, sure, we could put something like that in the
> contrib directory along with directions of how to build a new OSX
> package from source.
>
> Cheers,
>
> - Ted
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-11-23 20:49 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <EA601C64-3B42-4FA7-A572-6BD07443AEE1@lovstrand.com>
2015-11-21 14:10 ` fuse2fs Theodore Ts'o
2015-11-23 20:49 ` fuse2fs Darrick J. Wong
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox