From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Darrick J. Wong" Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] reflink: more tests Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 11:14:29 -0800 Message-ID: <20151210191429.GN10580@birch.djwong.org> References: <20151208062844.21871.23644.stgit@birch.djwong.org> <20151208062904.21871.30589.stgit@birch.djwong.org> <20151210163449.GA15774@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: david@fromorbit.com, fstests@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com, tao.peng@primarydata.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Anna.Schumaker@netapp.com, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org To: Christoph Hellwig Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20151210163449.GA15774@infradead.org> Sender: fstests-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 08:34:49AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > The new 849 fails reliably on btrfs, which makes me wonder if either > the test is doing something wrong, or the btrfs whole file clone > behavior is broken, which wouldn't be very reasuring. I didn't have > time to look into why it's failing yet. Huh. Works reliably for /me; could you send me the output from 849? --D > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html