From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Whitney Subject: [PATCH v2] e2fsck: fix problem report typo Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 13:31:18 -0500 Message-ID: <20160107183118.GB8716@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: tytso@mit.edu To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from mail-qg0-f48.google.com ([209.85.192.48]:34230 "EHLO mail-qg0-f48.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752814AbcAGSbv (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jan 2016 13:31:51 -0500 Received: by mail-qg0-f48.google.com with SMTP id 6so255895313qgy.1 for ; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 10:31:50 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Remove the stray left parenthesis. Observed while testing bigalloc_1k filesystems with shared/298 on 32 bit ARM running 4.3 kernels. v2: Modify the expect files for the relevant regression tests. Signed-off-by: Eric Whitney --- e2fsck/problem.c | 2 +- tests/f_compress_extent_tree_level/expect.1 | 2 +- tests/f_extent_oobounds/expect.1 | 2 +- 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/e2fsck/problem.c b/e2fsck/problem.c index a7da94d..7bd660d 100644 --- a/e2fsck/problem.c +++ b/e2fsck/problem.c @@ -1255,7 +1255,7 @@ static struct e2fsck_problem problem_table[] = { /* Inode extent tree could be narrower */ { PR_1E_CAN_NARROW_EXTENT_TREE, - N_("@i %i @x tree (at (level %b) could be narrower. "), + N_("@i %i @x tree (at level %b) could be narrower. "), PROMPT_FIX, PR_NO_OK | PR_PREEN_NO | PR_PREEN_OK }, /* Pass 2 errors */ diff --git a/tests/f_compress_extent_tree_level/expect.1 b/tests/f_compress_extent_tree_level/expect.1 index 1159f24..a359c99 100644 --- a/tests/f_compress_extent_tree_level/expect.1 +++ b/tests/f_compress_extent_tree_level/expect.1 @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ Level Entries Logical Physical Length Flags 1/ 1 2/ 3 19 - 19 104 - 104 1 1/ 1 3/ 3 21 - 21 105 - 105 1 Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes -Inode 12 extent tree (at (level 1) could be narrower. Fix? yes +Inode 12 extent tree (at level 1) could be narrower. Fix? yes Pass 1E: Optimizing extent trees Pass 2: Checking directory structure diff --git a/tests/f_extent_oobounds/expect.1 b/tests/f_extent_oobounds/expect.1 index 59e1952..056689f 100644 --- a/tests/f_extent_oobounds/expect.1 +++ b/tests/f_extent_oobounds/expect.1 @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Inode 12, end of extent exceeds allowed value (logical block 15, physical block 200, len 30) Clear? yes -Inode 12 extent tree (at (level 1) could be narrower. Fix? yes +Inode 12 extent tree (at level 1) could be narrower. Fix? yes Inode 12, i_blocks is 154, should be 94. Fix? yes -- 2.1.4