From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] dax, ext2, ext4, XFS: fix data corruption race
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 15:46:36 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160125204636.GI2948@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160124220107.GI20456@dastard>
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 09:01:07AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 04:06:11PM -0700, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> > With the current DAX code the following race exists:
> >
> > Process 1 Process 2
> > --------- ---------
> >
> > __dax_fault() - read file f, index 0
> > get_block() -> returns hole
> > __dax_fault() - write file f, index 0
> > get_block() -> allocates blocks
> > dax_insert_mapping()
> > dax_load_hole()
> > *data corruption*
> >
> > An analogous race exists between __dax_fault() loading a hole and
> > __dax_pmd_fault() allocating a PMD DAX page and trying to insert it, and
> > that race also ends in data corruption.
>
> Ok, so why doesn't this problem exist for the normal page cache
> insertion case with concurrent read vs write faults? It's because
> the write fault first does a read fault and so always the write
> fault always has a page in the radix tree for the get_block call
> that allocates the extents, right?
No, it's because allocation of blocks is separated from allocation of
struct page.
> And DAX has an optimisation in the page fault part where it skips
> the read fault part of the write fault? And so essentially the DAX
> write fault is missing the object (page lock of page in the radix
> tree) that the non-DAX write fault uses to avoid this problem?
>
> What happens if we get rid of that DAX write fault optimisation that
> skips the initial read fault? The write fault will always run on a
> mapping that has a hole loaded, right?, so the race between
> dax_load_hole() and dax_insert_mapping() goes away, because nothing
> will be calling dax_load_hole() once the write fault is allocating
> blocks....
So in your proposal, we'd look in the radix tree, find nothing,
call get_block(..., 0). If we get something back, we can insert it.
If we hit a hole, we allocate a struct page, put it in the radix tree
and return to user space. If that was a write fault after all, it'll
come back to us through the ->page_mkwrite handler where we can take the
page lock on the allocated struct page, then call down to DAX which calls
back through get_block to allocate? Then DAX kicks the struct page out
of the page cache and frees it.
That seems to work to me. And we can get rid of pfn_mkwrite at the same
time which seems like a win to me.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-25 20:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-22 23:06 [RFC PATCH] dax, ext2, ext4, XFS: fix data corruption race Ross Zwisler
2016-01-23 2:01 ` Matthew Wilcox
2016-01-24 22:01 ` Dave Chinner
2016-01-25 13:59 ` Jan Kara
2016-01-26 12:48 ` Matthew Wilcox
2016-01-26 13:05 ` Jan Kara
2016-01-26 14:47 ` Matthew Wilcox
2016-01-25 20:46 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2016-01-26 8:46 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160125204636.GI2948@linux.intel.com \
--to=willy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=jack@suse.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
--cc=ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).