From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Eric Whitney <enwlinux@gmail.com>, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests-bld: add exclude file for ext3 tests
Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2016 17:23:56 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160221062356.GA14668@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160221025754.GA15641@thunk.org>
On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 09:57:54PM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 11:34:11AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 10:51:57AM -0500, Eric Whitney wrote:
> > > Add an exclude file for the ext3 test case to prevent failure reports
> > > from tests that exercise unsupported online defrag functionality.
> >
> > ext3 should not run these tests because of the _requires_defrag
> > check in these tests results in a _notrun command being run
> > when FSTYP=ext3.
>
> In this particular case, the test is being run with
>
> FSTYP=ext4
> MKFS_OPTIONS="-q -O ^extents,^flex_bg,^uninit_bg,^64bit,^metadata_csum,^huge_file,^dir_nlink,^extra_isize"
> EXT_MOUNT_OPTIONS="nodelalloc"
>
> This is why _requires_defrag is passing and so ext4/307 and ext4/308
> is allowed to run.
Ok, I suspected that this was the reason for it occurring, but
that's not really testing "ext3" in the true sense - it's a modified
ext4 on-disk variant that happens to match the ext3 configuration.
> > > Two online defrag tests - ext4/307 and /308 - are not included because
> > > they contain explicit requirements for fallocate support that prevents
> > > them from running on an emulated ext3 file system.
> >
> > Same here.
>
> So probably the right answer here is to change _require_defrag so that
> for EXT4, to also add the assertion:
>
> _require_xfs_io_command "falloc"
>
> I'll note this is a not quite guaranteed to be correct because
> _require_xfs_io_command tests to see whether or not falloc works on
> TEST_DEV, and these tests are actually create a test file system on
> SCRATCH_DEV, and in theory TEST_DEV and SCRATCH_DEV could have
> different file system features. That's because xfstests never runs
> mkfs on TEST_DEV, but SCRATCH_DEV does get mkfs'ed and in theory the
> file system features set by MKFS_OPTIONS could be different from what
> exists on TEST_DEV.
Right - that's normally why we have "_require_scratch_foo" so that
it's specific which device requires that functionality. Seems easy
enough to fix that problem.
back to the ext4-as-ext3, defrag requires extents to be enabled in
the ext4 filesystem, right? So you could check whether than flag is
set easily enough with something like this:
dumpe2fs -h $dev |grep features |grep -q extent
if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
_notrun "Filesystem does not support defrag operations"
fi
That would work for everything with a fstyp of ext4, wouldn't it?
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-21 20:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-20 15:51 [PATCH] xfstests-bld: add exclude file for ext3 tests Eric Whitney
2016-02-21 0:34 ` Dave Chinner
2016-02-21 2:57 ` Theodore Ts'o
2016-02-21 5:45 ` Theodore Ts'o
2016-02-21 6:23 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2016-02-21 16:58 ` Theodore Ts'o
2016-02-22 0:26 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160221062356.GA14668@dastard \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=enwlinux@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).