From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] ext4: Simplify io_end handling for AIO DIO
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 23:38:34 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160309043834.GE3150@thunk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1455897582-13292-6-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz>
On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 04:59:41PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> When mapping blocks for direct IO, we allocate io_end structure before
> mapping blocks and store pointer to it in the inode. This creates a
> requirement that any AIO DIO using io_end must be protected by i_mutex.
> This created problems in the past with dioread_nolock mode which was
> corrupting io_end pointers. Also io_end is allocated unnecessarily in
> case where we don't need to convert any extents (which is a common case
> for example when overwriting file).
>
> We fix the problem by allocating io_end only once we return unwritten
> extent from block mapping function for AIO DIO (so we can save some
> pointless io_end allocations) and we pass pointer to it in bh->b_private
> which generic DIO code later passes to our end IO callback. That way we
> remove any need for global pointer to io_end structure and thus fix the
> races.
>
> The downside of this change is that the checking for unwritten IO in
> flight in ext4_extents_can_be_merged() is more racy since we now
> increment i_unwritten / set EXT4_STATE_DIO_UNWRITTEN only after dropping
> i_data_sem. However the check has been racy already before because
> ext4_writepages() already increment i_unwritten after dropping
> i_data_sem and reserved blocks save us from hitting ENOSPC in the worst
> case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Thanks, applied.
- Ted
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-09 4:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-19 15:59 [PATCH 0/6] ext4: Clean up io_end handling for AIO DIO Jan Kara
2016-02-19 15:59 ` [PATCH 1/6] ext4: Pack ioend structure better Jan Kara
2016-03-09 3:39 ` Theodore Ts'o
2016-02-19 15:59 ` [PATCH 2/6] ext4: Use i_mutex to serialize unaligned AIO DIO Jan Kara
2016-03-09 3:53 ` Theodore Ts'o
2016-02-19 15:59 ` [PATCH 3/6] ext4: Rename and split get blocks functions Jan Kara
2016-03-09 4:09 ` Theodore Ts'o
2016-02-19 15:59 ` [PATCH 4/6] ext4: Move trans handling and completion deferal out of _ext4_get_block Jan Kara
2016-03-09 4:27 ` Theodore Ts'o
2016-02-19 15:59 ` [PATCH 5/6] ext4: Simplify io_end handling for AIO DIO Jan Kara
2016-03-09 4:38 ` Theodore Ts'o [this message]
2016-02-19 15:59 ` [PATCH 6/6] ext4: Remove i_ioend_count Jan Kara
2016-03-09 4:53 ` Theodore Ts'o
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160309043834.GE3150@thunk.org \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).