From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/12] block: test fallocate for block devices Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 01:34:37 -0700 Message-ID: <20160315083437.GB8802@infradead.org> References: <20160305003717.28738.98818.stgit@birch.djwong.org> <20160305003837.28738.49794.stgit@birch.djwong.org> <20160305182508.GA25528@infradead.org> <20160315034148.GF30721@dastard> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" , fstests@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com, Christoph Hellwig , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org To: Dave Chinner Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160315034148.GF30721@dastard> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 02:41:48PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > I think it's the right place to test it - we have all the > infrastructure available to do it (i.e. xfs_io and various block > devices) and we really need to make sure this stuff works, > especially if we start to write filesystem code that depends on > correct behaviour... Ok. But let's keep it outside of the auto group so we don't run purely block device specific tests every time we do an xfstests run. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs