linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hpe.com>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
	Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Scott J Norton <scott.norton@hpe.com>,
	Douglas Hatch <doug.hatch@hpe.com>,
	Toshimitsu Kani <toshi.kani@hpe.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] percpu_stats: Simple per-cpu statistics count helper functions
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 12:02:28 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160404160228.GW7822@mtj.duckdns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1459566578-30221-3-git-send-email-Waiman.Long@hpe.com>

Hello,

On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 11:09:37PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
...
> +struct percpu_stats {
> +	unsigned long __percpu *stats;

I'm not sure ulong is the best choice here.  Atomic reads on 32bit are
nice but people often need 64bit counters for stats.  It probably is a
better idea to use u64_stats_sync.

> +/*
> + * Reset the all statistics counts to 0 in the percpu_stats structure

Proper function description please.

> + */
> +static inline void percpu_stats_reset(struct percpu_stats *pcs)

Why is this function inline?

> +{
> +	int cpu;
> +
> +	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> +		unsigned long *pstats =  per_cpu_ptr(pcs->stats, cpu);
                                       ^^
> +		int stat;
> +
> +		for (stat = 0; stat < pcs->nstats; stat++, pstats++)
> +			*pstats = 0;
> +	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * If a statistics count is in the middle of being updated, it
> +	 * is possible that the above clearing may not work. So we need
> +	 * to double check again to make sure that the counters are really
> +	 * cleared. Still there is a still a very small chance that the
> +	 * second clearing does not work.
> +	 */
> +	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> +		unsigned long *pstats =  per_cpu_ptr(pcs->stats, cpu);
> +		int stat;
> +
> +		for (stat = 0; stat < pcs->nstats; stat++, pstats++)
> +			if (*pstats)
> +				*pstats = 0;
> +	}

I don't think this is acceptable.

> +}
> +
> +static inline int percpu_stats_init(struct percpu_stats *pcs, int num)
> +{
> +	pcs->nstats = num;
> +	pcs->stats  = __alloc_percpu(sizeof(unsigned long) * num,
> +				     __alignof__(unsigned long));
> +	if (!pcs->stats)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	percpu_stats_reset(pcs);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline void percpu_stats_destroy(struct percpu_stats *pcs)
> +{
> +	free_percpu(pcs->stats);
> +	pcs->stats  = NULL;
> +	pcs->nstats = 0;
> +}

Why inline the above functions?

> +static inline void
> +__percpu_stats_add(struct percpu_stats *pcs, int stat, int cnt)
> +{
> +	unsigned long *pstat;
> +
> +	if ((unsigned int)stat >= pcs->nstats)
> +		return;

This is a critical bug.  Please don't fail silently.  BUG_ON(),
please.

> +	preempt_disable();
> +	pstat = this_cpu_ptr(&pcs->stats[stat]);
> +	*pstat += cnt;
> +	preempt_enable();
> +}

this_cpu_add() is atomic w.r.t. local operations.

> +static inline unsigned long
> +percpu_stats_sum(struct percpu_stats *pcs, int stat)
> +{
> +	int cpu;
> +	unsigned long sum = 0;
> +
> +	if ((unsigned int)stat >= pcs->nstats)
> +		return sum;

Ditto.

> +	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
> +		sum += per_cpu(pcs->stats[stat], cpu);
> +	return sum;
> +}

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-04-04 16:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-02  3:09 [PATCH 0/3] ext4: Improve parallel I/O performance on NVDIMM Waiman Long
2016-04-02  3:09 ` [PATCH 1/3] ext4: Pass in DIO_SKIP_DIO_COUNT flag if inode_dio_begin() called Waiman Long
2016-04-02  3:09 ` [PATCH 2/3] percpu_stats: Simple per-cpu statistics count helper functions Waiman Long
2016-04-04  7:36   ` Nikolay Borisov
2016-04-04 17:11     ` Waiman Long
2016-04-04 19:09       ` Christoph Lameter
2016-04-06 21:53         ` Waiman Long
2016-04-04 16:02   ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2016-04-06 19:52     ` Waiman Long
2016-04-06 21:51     ` Waiman Long
2016-04-06 22:54       ` Tejun Heo
2016-04-07 15:58         ` Waiman Long
2016-04-07 16:06           ` Tejun Heo
2016-04-07 18:52             ` Waiman Long
2016-04-07 18:58               ` Tejun Heo
2016-04-07 20:37                 ` Waiman Long
2016-04-07 20:41                   ` Tejun Heo
2016-04-07 21:38                     ` Waiman Long
2016-04-02  3:09 ` [PATCH 3/3] ext4: Make cache hits/misses per-cpu counts Waiman Long

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160404160228.GW7822@mtj.duckdns.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=Waiman.Long@hpe.com \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=doug.hatch@hpe.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=scott.norton@hpe.com \
    --cc=toshi.kani@hpe.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).