From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hpe.com>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Scott J Norton <scott.norton@hpe.com>,
Douglas Hatch <doug.hatch@hpe.com>,
Toshimitsu Kani <toshi.kani@hpe.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] percpu_stats: Simple per-cpu statistics count helper functions
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 12:02:28 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160404160228.GW7822@mtj.duckdns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1459566578-30221-3-git-send-email-Waiman.Long@hpe.com>
Hello,
On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 11:09:37PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
...
> +struct percpu_stats {
> + unsigned long __percpu *stats;
I'm not sure ulong is the best choice here. Atomic reads on 32bit are
nice but people often need 64bit counters for stats. It probably is a
better idea to use u64_stats_sync.
> +/*
> + * Reset the all statistics counts to 0 in the percpu_stats structure
Proper function description please.
> + */
> +static inline void percpu_stats_reset(struct percpu_stats *pcs)
Why is this function inline?
> +{
> + int cpu;
> +
> + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> + unsigned long *pstats = per_cpu_ptr(pcs->stats, cpu);
^^
> + int stat;
> +
> + for (stat = 0; stat < pcs->nstats; stat++, pstats++)
> + *pstats = 0;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * If a statistics count is in the middle of being updated, it
> + * is possible that the above clearing may not work. So we need
> + * to double check again to make sure that the counters are really
> + * cleared. Still there is a still a very small chance that the
> + * second clearing does not work.
> + */
> + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> + unsigned long *pstats = per_cpu_ptr(pcs->stats, cpu);
> + int stat;
> +
> + for (stat = 0; stat < pcs->nstats; stat++, pstats++)
> + if (*pstats)
> + *pstats = 0;
> + }
I don't think this is acceptable.
> +}
> +
> +static inline int percpu_stats_init(struct percpu_stats *pcs, int num)
> +{
> + pcs->nstats = num;
> + pcs->stats = __alloc_percpu(sizeof(unsigned long) * num,
> + __alignof__(unsigned long));
> + if (!pcs->stats)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + percpu_stats_reset(pcs);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline void percpu_stats_destroy(struct percpu_stats *pcs)
> +{
> + free_percpu(pcs->stats);
> + pcs->stats = NULL;
> + pcs->nstats = 0;
> +}
Why inline the above functions?
> +static inline void
> +__percpu_stats_add(struct percpu_stats *pcs, int stat, int cnt)
> +{
> + unsigned long *pstat;
> +
> + if ((unsigned int)stat >= pcs->nstats)
> + return;
This is a critical bug. Please don't fail silently. BUG_ON(),
please.
> + preempt_disable();
> + pstat = this_cpu_ptr(&pcs->stats[stat]);
> + *pstat += cnt;
> + preempt_enable();
> +}
this_cpu_add() is atomic w.r.t. local operations.
> +static inline unsigned long
> +percpu_stats_sum(struct percpu_stats *pcs, int stat)
> +{
> + int cpu;
> + unsigned long sum = 0;
> +
> + if ((unsigned int)stat >= pcs->nstats)
> + return sum;
Ditto.
> + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
> + sum += per_cpu(pcs->stats[stat], cpu);
> + return sum;
> +}
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-04 16:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-02 3:09 [PATCH 0/3] ext4: Improve parallel I/O performance on NVDIMM Waiman Long
2016-04-02 3:09 ` [PATCH 1/3] ext4: Pass in DIO_SKIP_DIO_COUNT flag if inode_dio_begin() called Waiman Long
2016-04-02 3:09 ` [PATCH 2/3] percpu_stats: Simple per-cpu statistics count helper functions Waiman Long
2016-04-04 7:36 ` Nikolay Borisov
2016-04-04 17:11 ` Waiman Long
2016-04-04 19:09 ` Christoph Lameter
2016-04-06 21:53 ` Waiman Long
2016-04-04 16:02 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2016-04-06 19:52 ` Waiman Long
2016-04-06 21:51 ` Waiman Long
2016-04-06 22:54 ` Tejun Heo
2016-04-07 15:58 ` Waiman Long
2016-04-07 16:06 ` Tejun Heo
2016-04-07 18:52 ` Waiman Long
2016-04-07 18:58 ` Tejun Heo
2016-04-07 20:37 ` Waiman Long
2016-04-07 20:41 ` Tejun Heo
2016-04-07 21:38 ` Waiman Long
2016-04-02 3:09 ` [PATCH 3/3] ext4: Make cache hits/misses per-cpu counts Waiman Long
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160404160228.GW7822@mtj.duckdns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=Waiman.Long@hpe.com \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=doug.hatch@hpe.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=scott.norton@hpe.com \
--cc=toshi.kani@hpe.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).