* [PATCH] ext4: don't call ext4_should_journal_data() on the journal inode
@ 2016-07-02 21:42 Vegard Nossum
2016-07-03 5:15 ` Theodore Ts'o
2016-07-04 8:08 ` Jan Kara
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Vegard Nossum @ 2016-07-02 21:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: tytso; +Cc: Jan Kara, linux-ext4, linux-fsdevel
Certain combinations of mount options in the superblock will cause
set_journal_csum_feature_set() in ext4_fill_super() to fail after the
journal has been created. When iput() is called on the journal inode,
we will hit the BUG() in ext4_should_journal_data(). We can prevent
this by only calling ext4_should_journal_data() if we already know
that it's not the journal inode.
Fixes: 2d859db3e4 ("ext4: fix data corruption in inodes with journalled data")
Fixes: 2b405bfa84 ("ext4: fix data=journal fast mount/umount hang")
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com>
---
fs/ext4/inode.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
index 91b66db..2591236 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@ -207,9 +207,9 @@ void ext4_evict_inode(struct inode *inode)
* Note that directories do not have this problem because they
* don't use page cache.
*/
- if (ext4_should_journal_data(inode) &&
- (S_ISLNK(inode->i_mode) || S_ISREG(inode->i_mode)) &&
- inode->i_ino != EXT4_JOURNAL_INO) {
+ if (inode->i_ino != EXT4_JOURNAL_INO &&
+ ext4_should_journal_data(inode) &&
+ (S_ISLNK(inode->i_mode) || S_ISREG(inode->i_mode))) {
journal_t *journal = EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb)->s_journal;
tid_t commit_tid = EXT4_I(inode)->i_datasync_tid;
--
1.9.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ext4: don't call ext4_should_journal_data() on the journal inode
2016-07-02 21:42 [PATCH] ext4: don't call ext4_should_journal_data() on the journal inode Vegard Nossum
@ 2016-07-03 5:15 ` Theodore Ts'o
2016-07-03 7:05 ` Vegard Nossum
2016-07-04 8:08 ` Jan Kara
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Theodore Ts'o @ 2016-07-03 5:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vegard Nossum; +Cc: Jan Kara, linux-ext4, linux-fsdevel
On Sat, Jul 02, 2016 at 11:42:42PM +0200, Vegard Nossum wrote:
> Certain combinations of mount options in the superblock will cause
> set_journal_csum_feature_set() in ext4_fill_super() to fail after the
> journal has been created. When iput() is called on the journal inode,
> we will hit the BUG() in ext4_should_journal_data(). We can prevent
> this by only calling ext4_should_journal_data() if we already know
> that it's not the journal inode.
Which mount options? Can you please give a reproducer?
- Ted
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ext4: don't call ext4_should_journal_data() on the journal inode
2016-07-03 5:15 ` Theodore Ts'o
@ 2016-07-03 7:05 ` Vegard Nossum
2016-07-04 15:02 ` Theodore Ts'o
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Vegard Nossum @ 2016-07-03 7:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Theodore Ts'o; +Cc: Jan Kara, linux-ext4, linux-fsdevel
On 07/03/2016 07:15 AM, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 02, 2016 at 11:42:42PM +0200, Vegard Nossum wrote:
>> Certain combinations of mount options in the superblock will cause
>> set_journal_csum_feature_set() in ext4_fill_super() to fail after the
>> journal has been created. When iput() is called on the journal inode,
>> we will hit the BUG() in ext4_should_journal_data(). We can prevent
>> this by only calling ext4_should_journal_data() if we already know
>> that it's not the journal inode.
>
> Which mount options? Can you please give a reproducer?
Unfortunately I can't share the reproducer, but...
s->mount_opt = 0xa882c020, which seems like it is:
EXT4_MOUNT_ERRORS_RO
EXT4_MOUNT_XATTR_USER
EXT4_MOUNT_POSIX_ACL
EXT4_MOUNT_BARRIER
EXT4_MOUNT_JOURNAL_CHECKSUM
EXT4_MOUNT_DELALLOC
EXT4_MOUNT_BLOCK_VALIDITY
EXT4_MOUNT_INIT_INODE_TABLE
At mount time, this ends up calling
jbd2_journal_clear_features(JBD2_FEATURE_COMPAT_CHECKSUM, 0,
JBD2_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_CSUM_V3 | JBD2_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_CSUM_V2)
jbd2_journal_set_features(0, 0, JBD2_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_CSUM_V3) = 0 // fails
jbd2_journal_clear_features(0x0, 0x0, JBD2_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_ASYNC_COMMIT)
The reason the set_features() call ends up calling is because
journal->j_format_version == 1.
Maybe the "mount options" thing was a bit misleading and we should
rather say "Certain combinations of mount options
(EXT4_MOUNT_JOURNAL_CHECKSUM), journal format (v1), and superblock
features (EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_METADATA_CSUM) [...]" in the changelog.
Does that make more sense?
Hope this helps,
Vegard
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ext4: don't call ext4_should_journal_data() on the journal inode
2016-07-03 7:05 ` Vegard Nossum
@ 2016-07-04 15:02 ` Theodore Ts'o
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Theodore Ts'o @ 2016-07-04 15:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vegard Nossum; +Cc: Jan Kara, linux-ext4, linux-fsdevel
Thanks, I've reworded the commit description as follows:
ext4: don't call ext4_should_journal_data() on the journal inode
If ext4_fill_super() fails early, it's possible for
ext4_evict_inode() to call ext4_should_journal_data() before
superblock options and flags are fully set up. In that case, the
iput() on the journal inode can end up causing a BUG().
Work around this problem by reordering the tests so we only call
ext4_should_journal_data() after we know it's not the journal inode.
Fixes: 2d859db3e4 ("ext4: fix data corruption in inodes with journalled data")
Fixes: 2b405bfa84 ("ext4: fix data=journal fast mount/umount hang")
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ext4: don't call ext4_should_journal_data() on the journal inode
2016-07-02 21:42 [PATCH] ext4: don't call ext4_should_journal_data() on the journal inode Vegard Nossum
2016-07-03 5:15 ` Theodore Ts'o
@ 2016-07-04 8:08 ` Jan Kara
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kara @ 2016-07-04 8:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vegard Nossum; +Cc: tytso, Jan Kara, linux-ext4, linux-fsdevel
On Sat 02-07-16 23:42:42, Vegard Nossum wrote:
> Certain combinations of mount options in the superblock will cause
> set_journal_csum_feature_set() in ext4_fill_super() to fail after the
> journal has been created. When iput() is called on the journal inode,
> we will hit the BUG() in ext4_should_journal_data(). We can prevent
> this by only calling ext4_should_journal_data() if we already know
> that it's not the journal inode.
>
> Fixes: 2d859db3e4 ("ext4: fix data corruption in inodes with journalled data")
> Fixes: 2b405bfa84 ("ext4: fix data=journal fast mount/umount hang")
> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com>
The patch looks good. You can add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Honza
> ---
> fs/ext4/inode.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> index 91b66db..2591236 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> @@ -207,9 +207,9 @@ void ext4_evict_inode(struct inode *inode)
> * Note that directories do not have this problem because they
> * don't use page cache.
> */
> - if (ext4_should_journal_data(inode) &&
> - (S_ISLNK(inode->i_mode) || S_ISREG(inode->i_mode)) &&
> - inode->i_ino != EXT4_JOURNAL_INO) {
> + if (inode->i_ino != EXT4_JOURNAL_INO &&
> + ext4_should_journal_data(inode) &&
> + (S_ISLNK(inode->i_mode) || S_ISREG(inode->i_mode))) {
> journal_t *journal = EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb)->s_journal;
> tid_t commit_tid = EXT4_I(inode)->i_datasync_tid;
>
> --
> 1.9.1
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-07-04 15:02 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-07-02 21:42 [PATCH] ext4: don't call ext4_should_journal_data() on the journal inode Vegard Nossum
2016-07-03 5:15 ` Theodore Ts'o
2016-07-03 7:05 ` Vegard Nossum
2016-07-04 15:02 ` Theodore Ts'o
2016-07-04 8:08 ` Jan Kara
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).