From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Theodore Ts'o Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: Enable quota enforcement based on mount options Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 11:58:07 -0400 Message-ID: <20160728155807.GA27400@thunk.org> References: <1468841157-8083-1-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz> <20160728140411.GB19398@quack2.suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: Jan Kara Return-path: Received: from imap.thunk.org ([74.207.234.97]:53370 "EHLO imap.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161006AbcG1P6K (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jul 2016 11:58:10 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160728140411.GB19398@quack2.suse.cz> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 04:04:11PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > On Mon 18-07-16 13:25:57, Jan Kara wrote: > > When quota information is stored in quota files, we enable only quota > > accounting on mount and enforcement is enabled only in response to > > Q_QUOTAON quotactl. To make ext4 behavior consistent with XFS, we add a > > possibility to enable quota enforcement on mount by specifying > > corresponding quota mount option (usrquota, grpquota, prjquota). > > > > Signed-off-by: Jan Kara > > Ping Ted? The reason why I hadn't taken this patch yet was purely a matter of timing. It was bit too close to the merge window; yes, it was a fairly simple patch so it was relatively low risk, so it was a close call whether to include it, but ultimately I decided to hold off. - Ted