From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: optimize ext4 direct I/O locking for reading Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 06:18:54 -0700 Message-ID: <20160922131854.GA14759@infradead.org> References: <20160921052744.5223-1-tytso@mit.edu> <20160921132609.GA30232@infradead.org> <20160921143748.xswkovbjrtcgs3bq@thunk.org> <20160922123143.GO2834@quack2.suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Theodore Ts'o , Christoph Hellwig , Ext4 Developers List , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org To: Jan Kara Return-path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:52703 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933405AbcIVNS5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Sep 2016 09:18:57 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160922123143.GO2834@quack2.suse.cz> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 02:31:43PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > So I think what Christoph meant in this case is something like attached > patch. That achieves more than your dirty hack in a much cleaner way. > Beware, the patch is only compile-tested. Yes, that's exactly what I had in mind.