linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>,
	Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>,
	Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: Regression in next with ext4 oops
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2016 12:29:09 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161004192908.sl6iabbgkyyrdhes@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161004191633.muirbg7mvb3ylhhl@atomide.com>

* Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> [161004 12:17]:
> Hi,
> 
> * Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> [161004 08:00]:
> > On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 10:02:31AM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 11:00:41AM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > > Never seen this but I suspect it is a fallout from Al's directory locking
> > > > changes. In particular ext4_htree_fill_tree() builds rb-tree of found
> > > > directory entries in file->private_data (and generally modifies the
> > > > structure stored there) but after Al's changes we don't have exclusive
> > > > access to struct file if I'm right so if two processes end up calling
> > > > getdents() for the same 'struct file' we are doomed.
> > > 
> > > I haven't seen it either, and I've been doing a lot of testing on the
> > > ext4 test branch.  So I'm guessing Tony has the only reliable repro
> > > for the problem at the moment.  That being said, it shouldn't be that
> > > hard to create a test case for this and add it to xfstests.
> > > 
> > > I'm pretty sure Jan is right about this, though, but it would be great
> > > to a get a quick confirmation from Tony if at all possible.
> > 
> > Jan is wrong - we do have per-struct-file serialization for getdents()
> > et.al.  It might be a race between getdents() on *different* struct
> > file for the same directory, but ->private_data is not a problem.
> 
> OK found the guilty person after git bisect and that's me.
> 
> Git bisect points to commit d776fc86b82f ("wlcore: sdio: Populate config
> firmware data"), so adding Kalle to Cc.
> 
> Looks like update-initramfs does rmmod of wlcore_sdio and that triggers
> some issue with the wlcore driver or with SDIO/MMC. Or maybe it's a memory
> corruption issue. I don't know yet exactly what's going on here yet but
> I plan to find out after some lunch.

And the patch below seems to fix the issue as the driver is now
using devm_kzalloc. Will do some more testing and then will post
a proper patch. The same issue might be there for SPI glue also.

Regards,

Tony

8< -----------------
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/sdio.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/sdio.c
@@ -391,7 +391,6 @@ static void wl1271_remove(struct sdio_func *func)
 	pm_runtime_get_noresume(&func->dev);
 
 	platform_device_unregister(glue->core);
-	kfree(glue);
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PM

  reply	other threads:[~2016-10-04 19:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-03 23:30 Regression in next with ext4 oops Tony Lindgren
2016-10-04  9:00 ` Jan Kara
2016-10-04 14:02   ` Theodore Ts'o
2016-10-04 14:44     ` Tony Lindgren
2016-10-04 14:59     ` Al Viro
2016-10-04 19:07       ` Theodore Ts'o
2016-10-04 19:19         ` Tony Lindgren
2016-10-04 19:16       ` Tony Lindgren
2016-10-04 19:29         ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2016-10-04 19:41           ` Kalle Valo
2016-10-04 20:34             ` Tony Lindgren
2016-10-05  9:51               ` Kalle Valo
2016-10-04 14:18   ` Tony Lindgren
2016-10-04 14:56   ` Al Viro
2016-10-05  5:44     ` Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161004192908.sl6iabbgkyyrdhes@atomide.com \
    --to=tony@atomide.com \
    --cc=adilger@dilger.ca \
    --cc=ebiggers@google.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).