From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jan Kara Subject: Re: Regression in next with ext4 oops Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2016 07:44:45 +0200 Message-ID: <20161005054445.GA20752@quack2.suse.cz> References: <20161003233054.eltv3coiweht3ui4@atomide.com> <20161004090041.GE17515@quack2.suse.cz> <20161004145639.GY19539@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jan Kara , Tony Lindgren , Eric Biggers , Theodore Ts'o , Andreas Dilger , Jaegeuk Kim , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Al Viro Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161004145639.GY19539@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org On Tue 04-10-16 15:56:39, Al Viro wrote: > On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 11:00:41AM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > > Hi! > > > > On Mon 03-10-16 16:30:55, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > I'm seeing a repeatable oops with Linux next while running > > > update-initramfs, see below. I tried reverting commit 59aa5a3aeead > > > ("fscrypto: make filename crypto functions return 0 on success") > > > as that's the only commit changing ext4_htree_store_dirent, but > > > that did not help. > > > > > > Anybody else seeing something like this? > > > > Never seen this but I suspect it is a fallout from Al's directory locking > > changes. In particular ext4_htree_fill_tree() builds rb-tree of found > > directory entries in file->private_data (and generally modifies the > > structure stored there) but after Al's changes we don't have exclusive > > access to struct file if I'm right so if two processes end up calling > > getdents() for the same 'struct file' we are doomed. > > RTFS. We sure as hell *do* have exclusive access to struct file. See > /* POSIX.1-2008/SUSv4 Section XSI 2.9.7 */ > if (S_ISREG(inode->i_mode) || S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode)) > f->f_mode |= FMODE_ATOMIC_POS; > in do_dentry_open() as well as > if (file && (file->f_mode & FMODE_ATOMIC_POS)) { > if (file_count(file) > 1) { > v |= FDPUT_POS_UNLOCK; > mutex_lock(&file->f_pos_lock); > } > } > in __fdget_pos() and > f = fdget_pos(fd); > if (!f.file) > return -EBADF; > in getdents(2). Yeah, sorry. I've misunderstood how the FMODE_ATOMIC_POS thing works... Honza -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR