From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 11/41] thp: try to free page's buffers before attempt split Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 00:43:53 +0300 Message-ID: <20161011214353.GA27110@node.shutemov.name> References: <20160915115523.29737-1-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> <20160915115523.29737-12-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> <20161011154031.GK6952@quack2.suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Theodore Ts'o , Andreas Dilger , Jan Kara , Andrew Morton , Alexander Viro , Hugh Dickins , Andrea Arcangeli , Dave Hansen , Vlastimil Babka , Matthew Wilcox , Ross Zwisler , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org To: Jan Kara Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161011154031.GK6952@quack2.suse.cz> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 05:40:31PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > On Thu 15-09-16 14:54:53, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > > We want page to be isolated from the rest of the system before spliting > > it. We rely on page count to be 2 for file pages to make sure nobody > > uses the page: one pin to caller, one to radix-tree. > > > > Filesystems with backing storage can have page count increased if it has > > buffers. > > > > Let's try to free them, before attempt split. And remove one guarding > > VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(). > > > > Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov > ... > > @@ -2041,6 +2041,23 @@ int split_huge_page_to_list(struct page *page, struct list_head *list) > > goto out; > > } > > > > + /* Try to free buffers before attempt split */ > > + if (!PageSwapBacked(head) && PagePrivate(page)) { > > + /* > > + * We cannot trigger writeback from here due possible > > + * recursion if triggered from vmscan, only wait. > > + * > > + * Caller can trigger writeback it on its own, if safe. > > + */ > > + wait_on_page_writeback(head); > > + > > + if (page_has_buffers(head) && > > + !try_to_free_buffers(head)) { > > + ret = -EBUSY; > > + goto out; > > + } > > Shouldn't you rather use try_to_release_page() here? Because filesystems > have their ->releasepage() callbacks for freeing data associated with a > page. It is not guaranteed page private data are buffers although it is > true for ext4... Fair enough. Will fix this. -- Kirill A. Shutemov