From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Darrick J. Wong" Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfs: hoist {XFS, EXT4}_IOC_{GOING, SHUT}DOWN to the VFS Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 08:57:58 -0800 Message-ID: <20170223165758.GC5837@birch.djwong.org> References: <20170223075230.GB5837@birch.djwong.org> <20170223101518.GA1769@jaegeuk.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Chao Yu , Theodore Ts'o , linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Al Viro , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: Jaegeuk Kim Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170223101518.GA1769@jaegeuk.local> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 02:15:19AM -0800, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > Hello, > > On 02/23, Chao Yu wrote: > > Hi Darrick, > > > > On 2017/2/23 15:52, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > > ext4 and XFS expose the same shutdown ioctl with the same parameters, > > > so let's hoist the whole mess into the vfs headers. > > > > Could you cover f2fs in this patch since f2fs has already supported SHUTDOWN ioctl? > > It's funny that I submitted a similar patch two years ago along with f2fs > support. > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/5814991/ Heh, I didn't even realize that. I'll pull f2fs into the patch shortly. --D > > Thanks, ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot