From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: remove redundant check for encrypted file on dio write path
Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 10:24:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170523082410.GD1230@quack2.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170523005316.18996-1-ebiggers3@gmail.com>
On Mon 22-05-17 17:53:16, Eric Biggers wrote:
> From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
>
> Currently we don't allow direct I/O on encrypted regular files, so in
> such cases we return 0 early in ext4_direct_IO(). There was also an
> additional BUG_ON() check in ext4_direct_IO_write(), but it can never be
> hit because of the earlier check for the exact same condition in
> ext4_direct_IO(). There was also no matching check on the read path,
> which made the write path specific check seem very ad-hoc.
>
> Just remove the unnecessary BUG_ON().
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Yeah, the check is rather before the BUG_ON so I guess that there's no big
point in the BUG_ON. When looking at this code I have one question though:
So when you mount the filesystem with 'dioread_nolock', do overwriting
direct write to the file, and just after we do inode_unlock() in
ext4_direct_IO_write() someone calls EXT4_IOC_SET_ENCRYPTION_POLICY ioctl
on the file, the BUG_ON could actually trigger. So I think you need
to wait for outstanding direct IO for the file when setting encryption
policy. Likely in ext4_set_context() or maybe in the generic fscrypt code
(you need to wait after acquiring inode_lock), I'm not sure how other
filesystems using fscrypt handle this and whether it would make more sense
in the generic code or in ext4 specific one.
Honza
> ---
> fs/ext4/inode.c | 3 ---
> 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> index 1bd0bfa547f6..7c6e715b4d2e 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> @@ -3629,9 +3629,6 @@ static ssize_t ext4_direct_IO_write(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter)
> get_block_func = ext4_dio_get_block_unwritten_async;
> dio_flags = DIO_LOCKING;
> }
> -#ifdef CONFIG_EXT4_FS_ENCRYPTION
> - BUG_ON(ext4_encrypted_inode(inode) && S_ISREG(inode->i_mode));
> -#endif
> ret = __blockdev_direct_IO(iocb, inode, inode->i_sb->s_bdev, iter,
> get_block_func, ext4_end_io_dio, NULL,
> dio_flags);
> --
> 2.13.0.303.g4ebf302169-goog
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-23 8:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-23 0:53 [PATCH] ext4: remove redundant check for encrypted file on dio write path Eric Biggers
2017-05-23 6:03 ` David Gstir
2017-05-23 8:24 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2017-05-23 16:13 ` Eric Biggers
2017-05-24 8:10 ` Jan Kara
2017-05-24 22:21 ` Theodore Ts'o
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170523082410.GD1230@quack2.suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=ebiggers3@gmail.com \
--cc=ebiggers@google.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox