From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@gmail.com>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
gnehzuil.liu@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] ext4: fix up ext4_try_to_write_inline_data()
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2017 20:54:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170607035442.GB594@zzz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170606000359.16794-2-tytso@mit.edu>
On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 08:03:59PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> There were a number of bugs in ext4_try_to_write_inline_data() and the
> ext4_convert_inline_data_to_extent() function (which was only used by
> ext4_try_to_write_inline_data).
>
> For ext4_convert_inline_data_to_extent():
>
> * It didn't handle the dioread_nolock case correctly
> * It didn't convert the extent tree entry from unwritten to written.
> * It didn't correctly handle racing DIO reads
> * It didn't handle data=journal case correctly -- it doesn't follow
> the block modification correctly by failing to call
> ext4_handle_dirty_metadata() on the data block.
>
> We fix this by eliminating ext4_convert_inline_data_to_extent()
> completely, and use reg_convert_inline_data_nolock() since it has been
> fixed to be Completely Correct (tm). :-)
>
Is ext4_da_convert_inline_data_to_extent() broken too?
> /*
> * Try to write data in the inode.
> * If the inode has inline data, check whether the new write can be
> @@ -662,13 +553,19 @@ int ext4_try_to_write_inline_data(struct address_space *mapping,
> struct page *page;
> struct ext4_iloc iloc;
>
> - if (pos + len > ext4_get_max_inline_size(inode))
> - goto convert;
> -
> ret = ext4_get_inode_loc(inode, &iloc);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> + page = grab_cache_page_write_begin(mapping, 0, flags);
> + if (!page) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
Likewise, doesn't the page lock rank below transaction start? Also this jumps
to 'out' which looks at 'handle' before it's been initialized.
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-07 3:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-06 0:03 [RFC PATCH 1/2] ext4: add a version of convert_inline_data_nolock() for regular files Theodore Ts'o
2017-06-06 0:03 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] ext4: fix up ext4_try_to_write_inline_data() Theodore Ts'o
2017-06-07 3:54 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2017-06-07 3:47 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] ext4: add a version of convert_inline_data_nolock() for regular files Eric Biggers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170607035442.GB594@zzz \
--to=ebiggers3@gmail.com \
--cc=gnehzuil.liu@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).