From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>, Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>,
Khazhismel Kumykov <khazhy@google.com>,
adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: Return EIO on read error in ext4_find_entry
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 23:58:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170627215804.GD5250@amd> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170623122603.jmvyw4oqkojcapv3@thunk.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1369 bytes --]
Hi!
> > >> Previously, a read error would be ignored and we would eventually return
> > >> NULL from ext4_find_entry, which signals "no such file or directory". We
> > >> should be returning EIO.
> > >>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Khazhismel Kumykov <khazhy@google.com>
> > >
> > > Thanks, applied.
> >
> > I don't necessarily agree that this is an improvement.
> >
> > If the requested entry is not in the bad block, this will return an
> > error even if the file name could be found in another block. It
> > would be better to save the error until the end and only return -EIO
> > if the entry cannot be found.
>
> The problem is that if we continue, successive reads may all take
> seconds or minutes to fail, thus tieing up the process for a long
> time. If this process happens to be, say, the node's Kubernetes
> management server it can take down the entire node (since if there
...
> By returning EIO right away, we can "fast fail".
Well, OTOH if I have a bad flash, and get EIO trying to read
~/my-disertation-thesis.tex because ~/.emacs could not be read... I'll be
quite unhappy.
Yes, fast fail is nice when you have redundant machines, but can be a
problem otherwise.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-27 21:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-22 23:23 [PATCH] ext4: Return EIO on read error in ext4_find_entry Khazhismel Kumykov
2017-06-23 4:43 ` Theodore Ts'o
2017-06-23 6:33 ` Andreas Dilger
2017-06-23 12:26 ` Theodore Ts'o
2017-06-23 21:36 ` Andreas Dilger
2017-06-23 22:33 ` Khazhismel Kumykov
2017-06-23 23:26 ` Theodore Ts'o
2017-06-23 23:34 ` Andreas Dilger
2017-06-24 0:24 ` Theodore Ts'o
2017-06-26 19:22 ` Tahsin Erdogan
2017-06-26 20:45 ` Andreas Dilger
2017-06-27 21:58 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170627215804.GD5250@amd \
--to=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=adilger@dilger.ca \
--cc=khazhy@google.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).