From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
Reindl Harald <h.reindl@thelounge.net>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
kent.overstreet@gmail.com, linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: bcache with existing ext4 filesystem
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 22:55:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170725205526.GA31280@amd> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170725180225.2k3o6xtdnhygrhia@thunk.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1011 bytes --]
On Tue 2017-07-25 14:02:25, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 03:46:04PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> >
> > Is there some field in ext2 superblock that changes every time
> > filesystem is changed? Is mtime changed by fsck/badblocks/...?
>
> No, there isn't. If we were writing the superblock every time the
> file system is changed it would be ***extremely*** flash unfriendly.
> It would also be a scalability bottleneck, it would cause us to pay an
> extra HDD seek, etc. So it's a really bad Bad BAD idea, and so we
> don't do it.
Ok, I did not mean "every time" when I said "every time". That would
be too heavy.
I mean... is there something changed by the regular mount (like mtime)
plus by operations like fsck and badblocks?
In particular, does fsck change mtime when it writes to the
filesystem?
Thanks,
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-25 20:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-24 18:57 bcache with existing ext4 filesystem Pavel Machek
2017-07-24 19:08 ` Reindl Harald
2017-07-24 19:15 ` Pavel Machek
2017-07-24 19:27 ` Theodore Ts'o
2017-07-24 20:04 ` Pavel Machek
2017-07-25 4:51 ` Theodore Ts'o
2017-07-25 6:43 ` Pavel Machek
2017-07-25 10:32 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2017-07-25 11:12 ` Pavel Machek
2017-07-25 16:10 ` Theodore Ts'o
2017-07-25 18:13 ` Eric Wheeler
2017-07-25 22:02 ` Pavel Machek
2017-07-26 17:41 ` Eric Wheeler
2017-07-26 18:59 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2017-07-26 19:16 ` Eric Wheeler
2017-07-26 20:01 ` Pavel Machek
2017-07-25 13:46 ` Pavel Machek
2017-07-25 18:02 ` Theodore Ts'o
2017-07-25 20:55 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170725205526.GA31280@amd \
--to=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=h.reindl@thelounge.net \
--cc=kent.overstreet@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).