From: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: introduce per-inode DAX flag
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2017 11:00:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170808090016.lxfbcrhoybmyfvlc@rh_laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170807121212.nuiho4afmdjf5vsd@rh_laptop>
On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 02:12:12PM +0200, Lukas Czerner wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 05, 2017 at 01:46:01AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Please don't do this until we have a coherent DAX plan. So far
> > the flag in XFS seems like a massive mistake and we need to get
> > rid of it instead of adding it to more file systems.
>
> Hi, pardon my ignorance, but can you point me to the discussion where
> this was decided ? I must have missed it and I can't find it.
>
> Thanks!
> -Lukas
So I've read the thread where you talk about this. I do not see anything
about it being a masive mistake. I only see that you're confident that's
it's a wrong thing to do. Like you're ever not confident about
something;) Care to elaborate on what's wrong with it and why we do not
want it ? On the surface it does look like a usefull option to have.
-Lukas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-08 9:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-02 16:09 [PATCH] ext4: introduce per-inode DAX flag Lukas Czerner
2017-08-05 8:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-07 12:12 ` Lukas Czerner
2017-08-08 9:00 ` Lukas Czerner [this message]
2017-08-11 10:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-11 12:11 ` Lukas Czerner
2017-08-11 12:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-11 13:41 ` Lukas Czerner
2017-08-24 18:20 ` Theodore Ts'o
2017-08-25 7:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-25 15:14 ` Theodore Ts'o
2017-08-25 15:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-25 16:28 ` Theodore Ts'o
2017-08-25 23:33 ` Dave Chinner
2017-08-28 7:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-28 10:10 ` Dave Chinner
2017-08-29 15:49 ` Jan Kara
2017-08-29 22:57 ` Dave Chinner
2017-08-30 10:00 ` Jan Kara
2017-08-30 12:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-08-30 15:00 ` Theodore Ts'o
2017-08-30 15:30 ` Lukas Czerner
2017-08-30 15:29 ` Jan Kara
2017-08-30 16:05 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170808090016.lxfbcrhoybmyfvlc@rh_laptop \
--to=lczerner@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox