linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anton Blanchard <anton@ozlabs.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
	Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	Chandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ext4: fix warning about stack corruption
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2017 21:08:49 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170822210849.0edb91cc@kryten> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170801120438.1582336-1-arnd@arndb.de>

Hi Arnd,

> After commit 62d1034f53e3 ("fortify: use WARN instead of BUG for
> now"), we get a warning about possible stack overflow from a memcpy
> that was not strictly bounded to the size of the local variable:
> 
>     inlined from 'ext4_mb_seq_groups_show' at
> fs/ext4/mballoc.c:2322:2: include/linux/string.h:309:9: error:
> '__builtin_memcpy': writing between 161 and 1116 bytes into a region
> of size 160 overflows the destination [-Werror=stringop-overflow=]
> 
> We actually had a bug here that would have been found by the warning,
> but it was already fixed last year in commit 30a9d7afe70e ("ext4: fix
> stack memory corruption with 64k block size").
> 
> This replaces the fixed-length structure on the stack with a
> variable-length structure, using the correct upper bound that tells
> the compiler that everything is really fine here. I also change the
> loop count to check for the same upper bound for consistency, but the
> existing code is already correct here.
> 
> Note that while clang won't allow certain kinds of variable-length
> arrays in structures, this particular instance is fine, as the array
> is at the end of the structure, and the size is strictly bounded.

Unfortunately it doesn't appear to work, at least with ppc64le clang:

fs/ext4/mballoc.c:2303:17: error: fields must have a constant size: 'variable length array in structure' extension will never be supported
	ext4_grpblk_t counters[blocksize_bits + 2];

Anton

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-08-22 11:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20170726185219.GA57833@beast>
2017-08-01 12:04 ` [PATCH 1/2] ext4: fix warning about stack corruption Arnd Bergmann
2017-08-01 18:26   ` Kees Cook
2017-08-06  1:53   ` Theodore Ts'o
2017-08-06 20:34     ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-08-07  6:42   ` Chandan Rajendra
2017-08-22 11:08   ` Anton Blanchard [this message]
2017-08-22 11:57     ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-08-22 12:23       ` Anton Blanchard

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170822210849.0edb91cc@kryten \
    --to=anton@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).