public inbox for linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Ashlie Martinez <ashmrtn@utexas.edu>
Cc: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>,
	Vijay Chidambaram <vvijay03@gmail.com>,
	Ext4 <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ext4 fix for interaction between i_size, fallocate, and delalloc after a crash
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 19:48:16 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171130004816.pdzfqjluchtvfq6u@thunk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFk8rvY9_-GxghCA43G9JoVqw-8NTG7-oRxEcV_cudcgDcy=rQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 01:58:53PM -0600, Ashlie Martinez wrote:
> Ted,
> 
> 1.      write 0x137dd 0xdc69 0x0
> 2.      fallocate 0xb531 0xb5ad 0x21446
> 3.      collapse_range 0x1c000 0x4000 0x21446
> 4.      write 0x3e5ec 0x1a14 0x21446
> 5.      zero_range 0x20fac 0x6d9c 0x40000 keep_size
> 
> I have made a CrashMonkey test that runs the same operations run by
> xfstests generic/456 as I wanted a bit more control over the test. My
> test runs operations 1-3 from the list above, and then runs sleep(30).
> After that, it runs operations 4 and 5 (I skipped operation 6 as it
> doesn't seem to be related to the underlying cause of the bug).
> CrashMonkey then waits a further 120 seconds for IO to trickle down to
> the block device.

So I'm not sure exactly what Crashmonkey is doing here.  Are you
forcing a crash, or not?

So here's my test which I think should replicate what you are doing.

1.  Start "kvm-xfstests shell"
2.  Create the fsxops file:

	cat > /tmp/fsxops
	write 0x137dd 0xdc69 0x0
	fallocate 0xb531 0xb5ad 0x21446
	collapse_range 0x1c000 0x4000 0x21446
	write 0x3e5ec 0x1a14 0x21446
	zero_range 0x20fac 0x6d9c 0x40000 keep_size
	<type control-d>

3.  Create a scratch file system and mount it:

	mke2fs -Fq -t ext4 /dev/vdc
	mount /vdc

4.  Run fsx:

	./xfstests/ltp/fsx -d --replay-ops /tmp/fsxops /vdc/testfile

5.  Since I'm too lazy to wait 120 seconds, just force everything to disk:

	sync

6a.  Unmount the file system and check it:

	umount /vdc
	e2fsck -fy /dev/vdc

6b.   Force a crash, and then restart kvm-xfstests shell, and then check the file system:

	<type control-A followed by 'x'>
	kvm-xfstests shell
	e2fsck -fy /dev/vdc

In both cases, e2fsck does not complain.  In the 6b variant, e2fsck
will replay the journal first, but other than that, no real differences.

So, tell me --- how is what I am doing any different from your Crashmonkey test?

    	    	       	      - Ted

  reply	other threads:[~2017-11-30  0:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-17 15:43 ext4 fix for interaction between i_size, fallocate, and delalloc after a crash Ashlie Martinez
2017-11-21 16:17 ` Ashlie Martinez
2017-11-22 18:03 ` Theodore Ts'o
2017-11-23  5:39   ` Amir Goldstein
2017-11-27 14:31   ` Ashlie Martinez
2017-11-27 16:11     ` Theodore Ts'o
2017-11-28 13:04       ` Ashlie Martinez
2017-11-28 20:45         ` Theodore Ts'o
2017-11-28 21:27           ` Ashlie Martinez
2017-11-29  3:37             ` Amir Goldstein
2017-11-29  6:13             ` Theodore Ts'o
2017-11-29  8:07               ` Amir Goldstein
2017-11-29 19:58                 ` Ashlie Martinez
2017-11-30  0:48                   ` Theodore Ts'o [this message]
2017-11-30  1:46                     ` Ashlie Martinez
2017-11-30  4:46                       ` Theodore Ts'o
2017-11-30 14:22                         ` Theodore Ts'o
2017-11-30 14:51                         ` Ashlie Martinez
2017-11-30 15:27                           ` Theodore Ts'o
2017-11-30 15:40                             ` Ashlie Martinez
2017-12-02 20:00                               ` Ashlie Martinez
2017-11-30  0:24                 ` Theodore Ts'o
2017-11-30  6:46                   ` Amir Goldstein

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171130004816.pdzfqjluchtvfq6u@thunk.org \
    --to=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
    --cc=ashmrtn@utexas.edu \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vvijay03@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox