From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Ashlie Martinez <ashmrtn@utexas.edu>
Cc: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>,
Vijay Chidambaram <vvijay03@gmail.com>,
Ext4 <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ext4 fix for interaction between i_size, fallocate, and delalloc after a crash
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 19:48:16 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171130004816.pdzfqjluchtvfq6u@thunk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFk8rvY9_-GxghCA43G9JoVqw-8NTG7-oRxEcV_cudcgDcy=rQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 01:58:53PM -0600, Ashlie Martinez wrote:
> Ted,
>
> 1. write 0x137dd 0xdc69 0x0
> 2. fallocate 0xb531 0xb5ad 0x21446
> 3. collapse_range 0x1c000 0x4000 0x21446
> 4. write 0x3e5ec 0x1a14 0x21446
> 5. zero_range 0x20fac 0x6d9c 0x40000 keep_size
>
> I have made a CrashMonkey test that runs the same operations run by
> xfstests generic/456 as I wanted a bit more control over the test. My
> test runs operations 1-3 from the list above, and then runs sleep(30).
> After that, it runs operations 4 and 5 (I skipped operation 6 as it
> doesn't seem to be related to the underlying cause of the bug).
> CrashMonkey then waits a further 120 seconds for IO to trickle down to
> the block device.
So I'm not sure exactly what Crashmonkey is doing here. Are you
forcing a crash, or not?
So here's my test which I think should replicate what you are doing.
1. Start "kvm-xfstests shell"
2. Create the fsxops file:
cat > /tmp/fsxops
write 0x137dd 0xdc69 0x0
fallocate 0xb531 0xb5ad 0x21446
collapse_range 0x1c000 0x4000 0x21446
write 0x3e5ec 0x1a14 0x21446
zero_range 0x20fac 0x6d9c 0x40000 keep_size
<type control-d>
3. Create a scratch file system and mount it:
mke2fs -Fq -t ext4 /dev/vdc
mount /vdc
4. Run fsx:
./xfstests/ltp/fsx -d --replay-ops /tmp/fsxops /vdc/testfile
5. Since I'm too lazy to wait 120 seconds, just force everything to disk:
sync
6a. Unmount the file system and check it:
umount /vdc
e2fsck -fy /dev/vdc
6b. Force a crash, and then restart kvm-xfstests shell, and then check the file system:
<type control-A followed by 'x'>
kvm-xfstests shell
e2fsck -fy /dev/vdc
In both cases, e2fsck does not complain. In the 6b variant, e2fsck
will replay the journal first, but other than that, no real differences.
So, tell me --- how is what I am doing any different from your Crashmonkey test?
- Ted
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-30 0:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-17 15:43 ext4 fix for interaction between i_size, fallocate, and delalloc after a crash Ashlie Martinez
2017-11-21 16:17 ` Ashlie Martinez
2017-11-22 18:03 ` Theodore Ts'o
2017-11-23 5:39 ` Amir Goldstein
2017-11-27 14:31 ` Ashlie Martinez
2017-11-27 16:11 ` Theodore Ts'o
2017-11-28 13:04 ` Ashlie Martinez
2017-11-28 20:45 ` Theodore Ts'o
2017-11-28 21:27 ` Ashlie Martinez
2017-11-29 3:37 ` Amir Goldstein
2017-11-29 6:13 ` Theodore Ts'o
2017-11-29 8:07 ` Amir Goldstein
2017-11-29 19:58 ` Ashlie Martinez
2017-11-30 0:48 ` Theodore Ts'o [this message]
2017-11-30 1:46 ` Ashlie Martinez
2017-11-30 4:46 ` Theodore Ts'o
2017-11-30 14:22 ` Theodore Ts'o
2017-11-30 14:51 ` Ashlie Martinez
2017-11-30 15:27 ` Theodore Ts'o
2017-11-30 15:40 ` Ashlie Martinez
2017-12-02 20:00 ` Ashlie Martinez
2017-11-30 0:24 ` Theodore Ts'o
2017-11-30 6:46 ` Amir Goldstein
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171130004816.pdzfqjluchtvfq6u@thunk.org \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=ashmrtn@utexas.edu \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vvijay03@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox