From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: "Yan, Zheng" <zyan@redhat.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
ceph-devel <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
jlayton@redhat.com, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: save current->journal_info before calling fault/page_mkwrite
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 18:18:47 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171213181847.7295af1db2276837f184d0f9@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <12AE4806-72D3-4AA2-A483-693375DA7D36@redhat.com>
On Thu, 14 Dec 2017 10:09:58 +0800 "Yan, Zheng" <zyan@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> > On 14 Dec 2017, at 08:59, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 13 Dec 2017 11:58:36 +0800 "Yan, Zheng" <zyan@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> >> We recently got an Oops report:
> >>
> >> BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null)
> >> IP: jbd2__journal_start+0x38/0x1a2
> >> [...]
> >> Call Trace:
> >> ext4_page_mkwrite+0x307/0x52b
> >> _ext4_get_block+0xd8/0xd8
> >> do_page_mkwrite+0x6e/0xd8
> >> handle_mm_fault+0x686/0xf9b
> >> mntput_no_expire+0x1f/0x21e
> >> __do_page_fault+0x21d/0x465
> >> dput+0x4a/0x2f7
> >> page_fault+0x22/0x30
> >> copy_user_generic_string+0x2c/0x40
> >> copy_page_to_iter+0x8c/0x2b8
> >> generic_file_read_iter+0x26e/0x845
> >> timerqueue_del+0x31/0x90
> >> ceph_read_iter+0x697/0xa33 [ceph]
> >> hrtimer_cancel+0x23/0x41
> >> futex_wait+0x1c8/0x24d
> >> get_futex_key+0x32c/0x39a
> >> __vfs_read+0xe0/0x130
> >> vfs_read.part.1+0x6c/0x123
> >> handle_mm_fault+0x831/0xf9b
> >> __fget+0x7e/0xbf
> >> SyS_read+0x4d/0xb5
> >>
> >> The reason is that page fault can happen when one filesystem copies
> >> data from/to userspace, the filesystem may set current->journal_info.
> >> If the userspace memory is mapped to a file on another filesystem,
> >> the later filesystem may also want to use current->journal_info.
> >>
> >
> > whoops.
> >
> > A cc:stable will be needed here...
> >
> > A filesystem doesn't "copy data from/to userspace". I assume here
> > we're referring to a read() where the source is a pagecache page for
> > filesystem A and the destination is a MAP_SHARED page in filesystem B?
> >
> > But in that case I don't see why filesystem A would have a live
> > ->journal_info? It's just doing a read.
>
>
> Background: when there are multiple cephfs clients read/write a file at time same time, read/write should go directly to object store daemon, using page cache is disabled.
>
> ceph_read_iter() uses current->journal_info to pass context information to ceph_readpages(). ceph_readpages() needs to know if its caller has already gotten capability of using page cache (distinguish read from readahead/fadvise). If not, it tries getting the capability by itself. I checked other filesystem, btrfs probably suffers similar problem for its readpages. (verify_parent_transid() uses current->journal_info and it can be called by by btrfs_get_extent())
>
Ah. Well please let's get all that into the changelog.
> > Can you explain why you chose these two sites? Rather than, for
> > example, way up in handle_mm_fault()?
And please answer this?
> > It's hard to believe that a fault handler will alter ->journal_info if
> > it is handling a read fault, so perhaps we only need to do this for a
> > write fault? Although such an optimization probably isn't worthwhile.
> > The whole thing is only about three instructions.
> >
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-14 2:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-13 3:58 [PATCH] mm: save current->journal_info before calling fault/page_mkwrite Yan, Zheng
2017-12-13 13:53 ` Amon Ott
2017-12-14 0:59 ` Andrew Morton
2017-12-14 2:09 ` Yan, Zheng
2017-12-14 2:18 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2017-12-14 2:20 ` Yan, Zheng
2017-12-14 2:30 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171213181847.7295af1db2276837f184d0f9@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jlayton@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=zyan@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).