public inbox for linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
To: adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, tytso@mit.edu
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, dhowells@redhat.com
Subject: [RFC PATCH] ext4: don't split xattr inode refcounts across i_ctime and i_version fields
Date: Tue,  9 Jan 2018 09:47:01 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180109144701.27387-1-jlayton@kernel.org> (raw)

From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>

This patch is based on top of the i_version rework that I'm flogging
upstream. It's just a cleanup of some nastiness I noticed while in there.

This code uses the i_ctime and i_version fields to each store half of
a refcount. I suspect it was done this way long ago when the i_version
field was a 32 bits, and was never changed when the field was converted
to a 64 bit value.

Change the code to just store the refcount in the i_version field rather
than splitting it across both fields.

Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
---
 fs/ext4/xattr.c | 6 ++----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/xattr.c b/fs/ext4/xattr.c
index 63656dbafdc4..6ea78dd367ca 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/xattr.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/xattr.c
@@ -294,14 +294,12 @@ ext4_xattr_inode_hash(struct ext4_sb_info *sbi, const void *buffer, size_t size)
 
 static u64 ext4_xattr_inode_get_ref(struct inode *ea_inode)
 {
-	return ((u64)ea_inode->i_ctime.tv_sec << 32) |
-		(u32) inode_peek_iversion_raw(ea_inode);
+	return inode_peek_iversion_raw(ea_inode);
 }
 
 static void ext4_xattr_inode_set_ref(struct inode *ea_inode, u64 ref_count)
 {
-	ea_inode->i_ctime.tv_sec = (u32)(ref_count >> 32);
-	inode_set_iversion_raw(ea_inode, ref_count & 0xffffffff);
+	inode_set_iversion_raw(ea_inode, ref_count);
 }
 
 static u32 ext4_xattr_inode_get_hash(struct inode *ea_inode)
-- 
2.14.3

             reply	other threads:[~2018-01-09 14:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-09 14:47 Jeff Layton [this message]
2018-01-09 18:52 ` [RFC PATCH] ext4: don't split xattr inode refcounts across i_ctime and i_version fields Darrick J. Wong
2018-01-09 19:05   ` Jeff Layton
2018-01-11 18:39     ` Theodore Ts'o
2018-01-11 20:09       ` Jeff Layton
2018-01-11 22:41         ` Theodore Ts'o

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180109144701.27387-1-jlayton@kernel.org \
    --to=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox