From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jaegeuk Kim Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] fscrypt: symlink helpers and fscrypt.h cleanup Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 15:46:57 -0800 Message-ID: <20180116234657.GA22224@jaegeuk-macbookpro.roam.corp.google.com> References: <20180105184502.48473-1-ebiggers3@gmail.com> <20180112043338.GA8249@thunk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Eric Biggers , linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Eric Biggers To: Theodore Ts'o Return-path: Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:38694 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750830AbeAPXq6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Jan 2018 18:46:58 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180112043338.GA8249@thunk.org> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 01/11, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > I've taken the v2 version of this series, plus the ext4-specific > patches to use the new symlink helpers (from the v1 patch series). > After testing and validating them, I included the patches to convert > f2fs and ubifs to use the symlink helpers, so I could also grab the > cleanup patches from the V1 series. > > Jaeguk, Richard, please let me know if you are OK with my taking the > f2fs and ubifs changes in the fscrypt tree. It seems like it would > keep things simpler if we did that. I'm fine with that. Thanks, > > Cheers, > > - Ted