From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
Cc: tytso@mit.edu, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
lustre <lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org>
Subject: Re: [e2fsprogs PATCH] tune2fs: don't recover journal if device is busy.
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2018 18:16:09 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180212021609.GA5204@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <871shrrok4.fsf@notabene.neil.brown.name>
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 12:20:43PM +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
>
> tune2fs currently replays the journal if it needs
> recovery and the filesystem isn't mounted.
>
> The test for "is the filesystem mounted" isn't completely robust.
> Lustre makes use of ext4 filesystems in a way that they are mounted
> without being visible in /proc/mounts or similar.
> This usage can easily be detected by attempting to open the device
> with O_EXCL. tune2fs already does this and the EXT2_MF_BUSY flag
> is set if open(O_EXCL) fails.
> Several uses other than lustre mounts could cause O_EXCL to fail,
> but in any case it seems unwise to recover the journal when something
> else is keeping the device busy.
>
> So add an extra test to avoid journal recovery when the device
> is busy. This fixes some problems with lustre usage.
>
> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
>
> --
> Note: it seems wrong to recover the journal *after* making
> changes to the superblock - there is a good chance that
> recovering the journal will over-write those changes.
> This is what was happening that lead me to this problem.
> Shouldn't journal recovery happen *first*??
Yes. Oops. :/
This whole hunk ought to move up to be right after
ext2fs_check_if_mounted, I think.
As for this patch itself,
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
--D
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-12 2:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-12 1:20 [e2fsprogs PATCH] tune2fs: don't recover journal if device is busy NeilBrown
2018-02-12 2:16 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
[not found] ` <20180224222352.GC14111@thunk.org>
[not found] ` <20180224222352.GC14111-AKGzg7BKzIDYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>
2018-02-26 18:08 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180212021609.GA5204@magnolia \
--to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).