From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>, stable@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: add ext4_sb_bread() to disambiguate ENOMEM cases
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2018 13:21:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181122122155.GN9840@quack2.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181117233523.8832-1-tytso@mit.edu>
On Sat 17-11-18 18:35:23, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> Today, when sb_bread() returns NULL, this can either be because of an
> I/O error or because the system failed to allocate the buffer. Since
> it's an old interface, changing would require changing many call
> sites.
>
> So instead we create our own ext4_sb_bread(), which also allows us to
> set the REQ_META flag.
>
> Also fixed a problem in the xattr code where a NULL return in a
> function could also mean that the xattr was not found, which could
> lead to the wrong error getting returned to userspace.
>
> Fixes: ac27a0ec112a ("ext4: initial copy of files from ext3")
> Cc: stable@kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
...
> +/*
> + * This works like sb_bread() except it uses ERR_PTR for error
> + * returns. Currently with sb_bread it's impossible to distinguish
> + * between ENOMEM and EIO situations (since both result in a NULL
> + * return.
> + */
> +struct buffer_head *
> +ext4_sb_bread(struct super_block *sb, sector_t block)
> +{
> + struct buffer_head *bh = sb_getblk(sb, block);
> +
> + if (bh == NULL)
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> + if (buffer_uptodate(bh))
> + return bh;
> + ll_rw_block(REQ_OP_READ, REQ_META | REQ_PRIO, 1, &bh);
Is there a reason for REQ_PRIO? I'm not sure all REQ_META reads are really
a priority ones...
> + wait_on_buffer(bh);
> + if (buffer_uptodate(bh))
> + return bh;
> + put_bh(bh);
> + return ERR_PTR(-EIO);
> +}
> +
> static int ext4_verify_csum_type(struct super_block *sb,
> struct ext4_super_block *es)
> {
...
> @@ -696,26 +695,23 @@ ext4_xattr_block_list(struct dentry *dentry, char *buffer, size_t buffer_size)
> ea_idebug(inode, "buffer=%p, buffer_size=%ld",
> buffer, (long)buffer_size);
>
> - error = 0;
> if (!EXT4_I(inode)->i_file_acl)
> - goto cleanup;
> + return NULL;
NULL looks wrong here - should be 0 I guess...
Otherwise the patch looks good to me.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-22 23:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-17 23:35 [PATCH] ext4: add ext4_sb_bread() to disambiguate ENOMEM cases Theodore Ts'o
2018-11-20 1:14 ` kbuild test robot
2018-11-20 13:36 ` kbuild test robot
2018-11-20 13:36 ` [PATCH] ext4: fix odd_ptr_err.cocci warnings kbuild test robot
2018-11-22 12:21 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2018-11-22 21:12 ` [PATCH] ext4: add ext4_sb_bread() to disambiguate ENOMEM cases Theodore Y. Ts'o
2018-11-22 22:18 ` [PATCH -v2] " Theodore Ts'o
2018-11-23 12:15 ` [PATCH] " Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181122122155.GN9840@quack2.suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).