linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
To: "zhangyi (F)" <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, miaoxie@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: fix unsafe extent initialization
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 00:10:37 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181210051037.GG1840@mit.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181208142558.47955-1-yi.zhang@huawei.com>

On Sat, Dec 08, 2018 at 10:25:58PM +0800, zhangyi (F) wrote:
> Current ext4 will call ext4_ext_convert_to_initialized() to split and
> initialize an unwritten extent if someone write something to it. It may
> also zeroout the nearby blocks and expand the split extent if the
> allocated extent is fully inside i_size or new_size. But it may lead to
> inode inconsistency when system crash or the power fails.
> 
> Consider the following case:
>  - Create an empty file and buffer write from block A to D (with delay
>    allocate). It will update the i_size to D.
>  - Zero range from part of block B to D. It will allocate an unwritten
>    extent from B to D.
>  - The write back worker write block B and initialize the unwritten
>    extent from B to D, and then update the i_disksize to B.
>  - System crash.
>  - Remount and fsck complain about the extent size exceeds the inode
>    size.
> 
> This patch add checking i_disksize and chose the small one between
> i_size to make sure it's safe to convert extent to initialized.
> 
> ---------------------
> 
> This problem can reproduce by xfstests generic/482 with fsstress seed
> 1544025012.

Hmm, your explanation is great and the patch makes sense.  I haven't
been able to reproduce the problem by adding -s 1544025012 to the
fsstress arguments.  This may be because fsstress being run with two
processes (-p 2) and the failure may be timing dependent?

How easily can you replicate the problem?

						- Ted

  reply	other threads:[~2018-12-10  5:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-12-08 14:25 [PATCH] ext4: fix unsafe extent initialization zhangyi (F)
2018-12-10  5:10 ` Theodore Y. Ts'o [this message]
2018-12-10  9:26   ` zhangyi (F)
2018-12-10 20:14     ` Andreas Dilger
2018-12-12  9:19       ` zhangyi (F)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181210051037.GG1840@mit.edu \
    --to=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miaoxie@huawei.com \
    --cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).