From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <jack@suse.cz>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Subject: [PATCH] Revert "ext4: use ext4_write_inode() when fsyncing w/o a journal"
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2019 23:42:19 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190201044219.12802-1-tytso@mit.edu> (raw)
This reverts commit ad211f3e94b314a910d4af03178a0b52a7d1ee0a.
As Jan Kara pointed out, this change was unsafe since it means we lose
the call to sync_mapping_buffers() in the nojournal case. The
original point of the commit was avoid taking the inode mutex (since
it causes a lockdep warning in generic/113); but we need the mutex in
order to call sync_mapping_buffers().
The real fix to this problem was discussed here:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20181025150540.259281-4-bvanassche@acm.org
The proposed patch was to fix a syzbot complaint, but the problem can
also demonstrated via "kvm-xfstests -c nojournal generic/113".
Multiple solutions were discused in the e-mail thread, but none have
landed in the kernel as of this writing. Anyway, commit
ad211f3e94b314 is absolutely the wrong way to suppress the lockdep, so
revert it.
Fixes: ad211f3e94b314a910d4af03178a0b52a7d1ee0a ("ext4: use ext4_write_inode() when fsyncing w/o a journal")
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reported: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
---
fs/ext4/fsync.c | 13 ++++---------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/fsync.c b/fs/ext4/fsync.c
index 712f00995390..5508baa11bb6 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/fsync.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/fsync.c
@@ -116,16 +116,8 @@ int ext4_sync_file(struct file *file, loff_t start, loff_t end, int datasync)
goto out;
}
- ret = file_write_and_wait_range(file, start, end);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
-
if (!journal) {
- struct writeback_control wbc = {
- .sync_mode = WB_SYNC_ALL
- };
-
- ret = ext4_write_inode(inode, &wbc);
+ ret = __generic_file_fsync(file, start, end, datasync);
if (!ret)
ret = ext4_sync_parent(inode);
if (test_opt(inode->i_sb, BARRIER))
@@ -133,6 +125,9 @@ int ext4_sync_file(struct file *file, loff_t start, loff_t end, int datasync)
goto out;
}
+ ret = file_write_and_wait_range(file, start, end);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
/*
* data=writeback,ordered:
* The caller's filemap_fdatawrite()/wait will sync the data.
--
2.19.1
next reply other threads:[~2019-02-01 4:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-01 4:42 Theodore Ts'o [this message]
2019-02-01 21:21 ` [PATCH] Revert "ext4: use ext4_write_inode() when fsyncing w/o a journal" Jan Kara
2019-02-02 4:08 ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2019-02-04 9:45 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190201044219.12802-1-tytso@mit.edu \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).