public inbox for linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fscrypt: cache decrypted symlink target in ->i_link
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 05:31:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190410043135.GX2217@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190410040413.GC7140@sol.localdomain>

On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 09:04:15PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:

> > What's to stop you from doing just that right now?  You'd need to take
> > care with barriers, but you'd need that anyway... As soon as ->i_link is set
> > you'll get no more ->get_link() on that sucker, using the cached value
> > from that point on.  IDGI...
> 
> 1.) The VFS won't know to drop of RCU-walk mode, so waiting an RCU grace period
>     before freeing the symlink target becomes mandatory.  (Which I'd like to do
>     for fscrypt anyway, but doing it sanely appears to require implementing
>     .destroy_inode() for ext4, f2fs, and ubifs.  I hoped I could do non-RCU mode
>     as a simpler first step.)

You might want to check those filesystems.  All three you've mentioned *have*
->destroy_inode() already.
 
> 2.) The VFS won't know to use a read memory barrier when loading i_link.
>     The VFS could issue one unconditionally, but it would be unnecessary for
>     regular fast symlinks.

Not really.  All we need on the read side is READ_ONCE(); it will supply
smp_read_barrier_depends() (which is a no-op except for alpha).  On the
write side we need smp_store_release() to set ->i_link (in addition to
whatever serialization we want for actual calculation of the value to
be cached, of course).

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-04-10  4:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-09 23:35 [PATCH] fscrypt: cache decrypted symlink target in ->i_link Eric Biggers
2019-04-10  0:33 ` Al Viro
2019-04-10  0:45   ` Eric Biggers
2019-04-10  1:04     ` Al Viro
2019-04-10  1:22       ` Eric Biggers
2019-04-10  1:39         ` Al Viro
2019-04-10  2:58           ` Eric Biggers
2019-04-10  3:44             ` Al Viro
2019-04-10  4:04               ` Eric Biggers
2019-04-10  4:16                 ` Eric Biggers
2019-04-10  4:31                 ` Al Viro [this message]
2019-04-10  5:04                   ` Eric Biggers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190410043135.GX2217@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    --to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox