From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fscrypt: cache decrypted symlink target in ->i_link
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 05:31:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190410043135.GX2217@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190410040413.GC7140@sol.localdomain>
On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 09:04:15PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > What's to stop you from doing just that right now? You'd need to take
> > care with barriers, but you'd need that anyway... As soon as ->i_link is set
> > you'll get no more ->get_link() on that sucker, using the cached value
> > from that point on. IDGI...
>
> 1.) The VFS won't know to drop of RCU-walk mode, so waiting an RCU grace period
> before freeing the symlink target becomes mandatory. (Which I'd like to do
> for fscrypt anyway, but doing it sanely appears to require implementing
> .destroy_inode() for ext4, f2fs, and ubifs. I hoped I could do non-RCU mode
> as a simpler first step.)
You might want to check those filesystems. All three you've mentioned *have*
->destroy_inode() already.
> 2.) The VFS won't know to use a read memory barrier when loading i_link.
> The VFS could issue one unconditionally, but it would be unnecessary for
> regular fast symlinks.
Not really. All we need on the read side is READ_ONCE(); it will supply
smp_read_barrier_depends() (which is a no-op except for alpha). On the
write side we need smp_store_release() to set ->i_link (in addition to
whatever serialization we want for actual calculation of the value to
be cached, of course).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-10 4:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-09 23:35 [PATCH] fscrypt: cache decrypted symlink target in ->i_link Eric Biggers
2019-04-10 0:33 ` Al Viro
2019-04-10 0:45 ` Eric Biggers
2019-04-10 1:04 ` Al Viro
2019-04-10 1:22 ` Eric Biggers
2019-04-10 1:39 ` Al Viro
2019-04-10 2:58 ` Eric Biggers
2019-04-10 3:44 ` Al Viro
2019-04-10 4:04 ` Eric Biggers
2019-04-10 4:16 ` Eric Biggers
2019-04-10 4:31 ` Al Viro [this message]
2019-04-10 5:04 ` Eric Biggers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190410043135.GX2217@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox