linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Debabrata Banerjee <dbanerje@akamai.com>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
	Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: bad mount opts in no journal mode
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2019 22:21:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190428202154.GE7441@quack2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190411214917.1899-1-dbanerje@akamai.com>

On Thu 11-04-19 17:49:17, Debabrata Banerjee wrote:
> Fixes:
> commit 1e381f60dad9 ("ext4: do not allow journal_opts for fs w/o journal")
> 
> Instead of removing EXT4_MOUNT_JOURNAL_CHECKSUM from s_def_mount_opt as
> I assume was intended, all other options were blown away leading to
> _ext4_show_options() output being incorrect. I don't see why this or
> other journal related flags should be removed from s_def_mount_opt
> regardless, it is only used for comparison to display opts, and we
> already made sure they couldn't be set.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Debabrata Banerjee <dbanerje@akamai.com>

So I agree that the clearing is wrong. But I don't agree with just deleting
the line. We could have JOURNAL_CHECKSUM in s_def_mount_opt in nojournal
mode and in such case we don't want to show in /proc/mounts
nojournal_checksum as a mount option. So the line should be really fixed
to:

	sbi->s_def_mount_opt &= ~EXT4_MOUNT_JOURNAL_CHECKSUM;

								Honza

> ---
>  fs/ext4/super.c | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
> index 6ed4eb81e674..63eef29666e0 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/super.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
> @@ -4238,7 +4238,6 @@ static int ext4_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
>  				 "data=, fs mounted w/o journal");
>  			goto failed_mount_wq;
>  		}
> -		sbi->s_def_mount_opt &= EXT4_MOUNT_JOURNAL_CHECKSUM;
>  		clear_opt(sb, JOURNAL_CHECKSUM);
>  		clear_opt(sb, DATA_FLAGS);
>  		sbi->s_journal = NULL;
> -- 
> 2.21.0
> 
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR

      parent reply	other threads:[~2019-04-29 11:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-11 21:49 [PATCH] ext4: bad mount opts in no journal mode Debabrata Banerjee
2019-04-23 14:33 ` Banerjee, Debabrata
2019-04-28 20:21 ` Jan Kara [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190428202154.GE7441@quack2 \
    --to=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=dbanerje@akamai.com \
    --cc=dmonakhov@openvz.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).