public inbox for linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: fstests@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/7] xfstests: verify fscrypt-encrypted contents and filenames
Date: Mon, 6 May 2019 08:57:22 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190506155721.GB661@sol.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190426204153.101861-1-ebiggers@kernel.org>

On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 01:41:46PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> This series adds xfstests which verify that encrypted contents and
> filenames on ext4 and f2fs are actually correct, i.e. that the
> encryption uses the correct algorithms, keys, IVs, and padding amounts.
> The new tests work by creating encrypted files, unmounting the
> filesystem, reading the ciphertext from disk using dd and debugfs or
> dump.f2fs, and then comparing it against ciphertext computed
> independently by a new test program that implements the same algorithms.
> 
> These tests are important because:
> 
> - The whole point of file encryption is that the files are actually
>   encrypted correctly on-disk.  Except for generic/399, current xfstests
>   only tests the filesystem semantics, not the actual encryption.
>   generic/399 only tests for incompressibility of encrypted file
>   contents using one particular encryption setting, which isn't much.
> 
> - fscrypt now supports 4 main combinations of encryption settings,
>   rather than 1 as it did originally.  This may be doubled to 8 soon
>   (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10908153/).  We should test all
>   settings.  And without tests, even if the initial implementation is
>   correct, breakage in one specific setting could go undetected.
> 
> - Though Linux's crypto API has self-tests, these only test the
>   algorithms themselves, not how they are used, e.g. by fscrypt.
> 
> Patch 1 is a cleanup patch.  Patches 2-4 add the common helpers for
> ciphertext verification tests.  Patches 5-7 add the actual tests.
> 
> These tests require e2fsprogs and f2fs-tools patches I recently sent out
> to fix printing encrypted filenames.  So, this series might not be
> suitable for merging into mainline xfstests until those patches are
> applied.  Regardless, comments are appreciated.  The needed patches are:
> 
> 	debugfs: avoid ambiguity when printing filenames (https://marc.info/?l=linux-ext4&m=155596495624232&w=2)
> 	f2fs-tools: improve filename printing (https://sourceforge.net/p/linux-f2fs/mailman/message/36648641/)
> 
> This series can also be retrieved from git at
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ebiggers/xfstests-dev.git
> branch "ciphertext-verification".
> 
> I also have patches on top of this series which verify the ciphertext
> produced from v2 encryption policies, which are proposed by my kernel
> patch series "fscrypt: key management improvements"
> (https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/10908107/).  v2 encryption policies
> will use a different key derivation function, and thus their ciphertext
> will be different.  These additional patches can be found at branch
> "fscrypt-key-mgmt-improvements" of my git repo above.  But I've arranged
> things such that this shorter series can potentially be applied earlier,
> to test what's in the kernel now.
> 
> Eric Biggers (7):
>   common/encrypt: introduce helpers for set_encpolicy and get_encpolicy
>   fscrypt-crypt-util: add utility for reproducing fscrypt encrypted data
>   common/encrypt: support requiring other encryption settings
>   common/encrypt: add helper for ciphertext verification tests
>   generic: verify ciphertext of v1 encryption policies with AES-256
>   generic: verify ciphertext of v1 encryption policies with AES-128
>   generic: verify ciphertext of v1 encryption policies with Adiantum
> 
>  .gitignore               |    1 +
>  common/encrypt           |  482 ++++++++++-
>  src/Makefile             |    3 +-
>  src/fscrypt-crypt-util.c | 1645 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  tests/ext4/024           |    3 +-
>  tests/generic/395        |   28 +-
>  tests/generic/395.out    |    2 +-
>  tests/generic/396        |   15 +-
>  tests/generic/397        |    3 +-
>  tests/generic/398        |    5 +-
>  tests/generic/399        |    3 +-
>  tests/generic/419        |    3 +-
>  tests/generic/421        |    3 +-
>  tests/generic/429        |    3 +-
>  tests/generic/435        |    3 +-
>  tests/generic/440        |    5 +-
>  tests/generic/700        |   41 +
>  tests/generic/700.out    |    5 +
>  tests/generic/701        |   41 +
>  tests/generic/701.out    |    5 +
>  tests/generic/702        |   43 +
>  tests/generic/702.out    |   10 +
>  tests/generic/group      |    3 +
>  23 files changed, 2308 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 src/fscrypt-crypt-util.c
>  create mode 100755 tests/generic/700
>  create mode 100644 tests/generic/700.out
>  create mode 100755 tests/generic/701
>  create mode 100644 tests/generic/701.out
>  create mode 100755 tests/generic/702
>  create mode 100644 tests/generic/702.out
> 
> -- 
> 2.21.0.593.g511ec345e18-goog
> 

Any comments on this?

FYI, the e2fsprogs patch that these tests need was applied.

I'm still waiting for the f2fs-tools patch.

- Eric

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-05-06 15:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-26 20:41 [RFC PATCH 0/7] xfstests: verify fscrypt-encrypted contents and filenames Eric Biggers
2019-04-26 20:41 ` [RFC PATCH 1/7] common/encrypt: introduce helpers for set_encpolicy and get_encpolicy Eric Biggers
2019-05-12 12:21   ` Eryu Guan
2019-04-26 20:41 ` [RFC PATCH 2/7] fscrypt-crypt-util: add utility for reproducing fscrypt encrypted data Eric Biggers
2019-04-26 20:41 ` [RFC PATCH 3/7] common/encrypt: support requiring other encryption settings Eric Biggers
2019-04-26 20:41 ` [RFC PATCH 4/7] common/encrypt: add helper for ciphertext verification tests Eric Biggers
2019-05-12 12:27   ` Eryu Guan
2019-05-13 19:12     ` Eric Biggers
2019-05-14  2:20       ` Eryu Guan
2019-04-26 20:41 ` [RFC PATCH 5/7] generic: verify ciphertext of v1 encryption policies with AES-256 Eric Biggers
2019-04-26 20:41 ` [RFC PATCH 6/7] generic: verify ciphertext of v1 encryption policies with AES-128 Eric Biggers
2019-04-26 20:41 ` [RFC PATCH 7/7] generic: verify ciphertext of v1 encryption policies with Adiantum Eric Biggers
2019-05-06 15:57 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2019-05-12 12:58   ` [RFC PATCH 0/7] xfstests: verify fscrypt-encrypted contents and filenames Eryu Guan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190506155721.GB661@sol.localdomain \
    --to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox