linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Artem Blagodarenko <artem.blagodarenko@gmail.com>
To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Cc: adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk
Subject: [PATCH] e2fsck: process empty directory if large_dir and inline_data set
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 17:42:37 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190614144237.6010-1-c17828@cray.com> (raw)

Doing a forced check on an ext4 file system with inline_data and
large_dir results in lots of fsck messages. To reproduce:

truncate -s 100000000 ext4.img
misc/mke2fs -t ext4 -I 512 -O 'inline_data,large_dir' ext4.img
mkdir m
sudo mount ext4.img m
mkdir m/aa
sudo umount m
e2fsck/e2fsck -f -n ext4.img

The last command gives this output:

[root@localhost e2fsprogs-kernel]# e2fsck/e2fsck -f -n ext4-2.img
e2fsck 1.45.2 (27-May-2019)
Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes
Pass 2: Checking directory structure
Pass 3: Checking directory connectivity
'..' in /aa (12) is <The NULL inode> (0), should be / (2).
Fix? no

Pass 4: Checking reference counts
Inode 2 ref count is 4, should be 3.  Fix? no

Inode 12 ref count is 2, should be 1.  Fix? no

Pass 5: Checking group summary information

ext4-2.img: ********** WARNING: Filesystem still has errors **********

ext4-2.img: 12/24384 files (0.0% non-contiguous), 17874/97656 blocks

Rootcause of this issue is large_dir optimization that is not
appropriate for inline_data.

Let's not optimize it if inline_data is set.

Reported-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: Artem Blagodarenko <c17828@cray.com>
---
 e2fsck/pass2.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/e2fsck/pass2.c b/e2fsck/pass2.c
index a7d9c47d..8b40e93d 100644
--- a/e2fsck/pass2.c
+++ b/e2fsck/pass2.c
@@ -980,7 +980,8 @@ static int check_dir_block(ext2_filsys fs,
 	 * very large and then the files are deleted. For now, all that is
 	 * needed is to avoid e2fsck filling in these holes as part of
 	 * feature flag. */
-	if (db->blk == 0 && ext2fs_has_feature_largedir(fs->super))
+	if (db->blk == 0 && ext2fs_has_feature_largedir(fs->super) &&
+	    !ext2fs_has_feature_inline_data(fs->super))
 		return 0;
 
 	if (db->blk == 0 && !inline_data_size) {
-- 
2.14.3


             reply	other threads:[~2019-06-14 14:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-14 14:42 Artem Blagodarenko [this message]
2019-06-19 19:00 ` [PATCH] e2fsck: process empty directory if large_dir and inline_data set Theodore Ts'o

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190614144237.6010-1-c17828@cray.com \
    --to=artem.blagodarenko@gmail.com \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).