From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94619C43613 for ; Thu, 20 Jun 2019 21:46:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 578062085A for ; Thu, 20 Jun 2019 21:46:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726145AbfFTVqo (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Jun 2019 17:46:44 -0400 Received: from outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu ([18.9.28.11]:57617 "EHLO outgoing.mit.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725921AbfFTVqo (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Jun 2019 17:46:44 -0400 Received: from callcc.thunk.org (guestnat-104-133-0-109.corp.google.com [104.133.0.109] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as tytso@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id x5KLkVQl013281 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 20 Jun 2019 17:46:33 -0400 Received: by callcc.thunk.org (Postfix, from userid 15806) id A92D0420484; Thu, 20 Jun 2019 17:46:31 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2019 17:46:31 -0400 From: "Theodore Ts'o" To: "Darrick J. Wong" Cc: Eryu Guan , Gabriel Krisman Bertazi , fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, "Lakshmipathi.G" Subject: Re: Removing the shared class of tests Message-ID: <20190620214631.GF4650@mit.edu> References: <20190612184033.21845-1-krisman@collabora.com> <20190612184033.21845-2-krisman@collabora.com> <20190616144440.GD15846@desktop> <20190616200154.GA7251@mit.edu> <20190620112903.GF15846@desktop> <20190620162116.GA4650@mit.edu> <20190620175035.GA5380@magnolia> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190620175035.GA5380@magnolia> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 10:50:35AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > The shared/006 test needs some way of descriminating which inodes have > > a fixed number of inodes, since it fills a small file system until it > > runs out of space and then runs fsck on it. Actually, if we make the > > test file system smaller, so it runs in finite time, we could probably > > just run it on all file systems, since checking to see what file > > systems which don't have a fixed inode table (e.g., btrfs) do under > > ENOSPC when creating tons of inodes probably makes sense there for > > those file systems as well. > > xfs doesn't have a fixed inode table either, so ... that sounds like a > good idea. Which is amusing, given that shared/006 declares that it is supported for xfs. So it might just work on btrfs w/o any changes; although maybe it just takes too long to run. :-) - Ted