From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Matthew Bobrowski <mbobrowski@mbobrowski.org>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
jack@suse.cz, tytso@mit.edu, riteshh@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] ext4: introduce direct IO write code path using iomap infrastructure
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2019 10:34:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190812173403.GD24564@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <581c3a2da89991e7ce5862d93dcfb23e1dc8ddc8.1565609891.git.mbobrowski@mbobrowski.org>
> + if (error) {
> + if (offset + size > i_size_read(inode))
> + ext4_truncate_failed_write(inode);
> +
> + /*
> + * The inode may have been placed onto the orphan list
> + * as a result of an extension. However, an error may
> + * have been encountered prior to being able to
> + * complete the write operation. Perform any necessary
> + * clean up in this case.
> + */
> + if (!list_empty(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_orphan)) {
> + handle = ext4_journal_start(inode, EXT4_HT_INODE, 2);
> + if (IS_ERR(handle)) {
> + if (inode->i_nlink)
> + ext4_orphan_del(NULL, inode);
> + return PTR_ERR(handle);
> + }
> +
> + if (inode->i_nlink)
> + ext4_orphan_del(handle, inode);
> + ext4_journal_stop(handle);
> + }
> + return error;
I'd split this branch into a separate function just to keep the
end_io handler tidy.
> + if (ret == -EIOCBQUEUED && (unaligned_aio || extend))
> + inode_dio_wait(inode);
> +
> + if (ret >= 0 && iov_iter_count(from)) {
> + overwrite ? inode_unlock_shared(inode) : inode_unlock(inode);
> + return ext4_buffered_write_iter(iocb, from);
> + }
> +out:
> + overwrite ? inode_unlock_shared(inode) : inode_unlock(inode);
> + return ret;
the ? : expression here is weird.
I'd write this as:
if (overwrite)
inode_unlock_shared(inode);
else
inode_unlock(inode);
if (ret >= 0 && iov_iter_count(from))
return ext4_buffered_write_iter(iocb, from);
return ret;
and handle the only place we jump to the current out label manually,
as that always does an exclusive unlock anyway.
> + if (IS_DAX(inode)) {
> + ret = ext4_map_blocks(handle, inode, &map,
> + EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CREATE_ZERO);
> + } else {
> + /*
> + * DAX and direct IO are the only two
> + * operations currently supported with
> + * IOMAP_WRITE.
> + */
> + WARN_ON(!(flags & IOMAP_DIRECT));
> + if (round_down(offset, i_blocksize(inode)) >=
> + i_size_read(inode)) {
> + ret = ext4_map_blocks(handle, inode, &map,
> + EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CREATE);
> + } else if (!ext4_test_inode_flag(inode,
> + EXT4_INODE_EXTENTS)) {
> + /*
> + * We cannot fill holes in indirect
> + * tree based inodes as that could
> + * expose stale data in the case of a
> + * crash. Use magic error code to
> + * fallback to buffered IO.
> + */
> + ret = ext4_map_blocks(handle, inode, &map, 0);
> + if (ret == 0)
> + ret = -ENOTBLK;
> + } else {
> + ret = ext4_map_blocks(handle, inode, &map,
> + EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_IO_CREATE_EXT);
> + }
> + }
I think this could be simplified down to something like:
int flags = 0;
...
/*
* DAX and direct IO are the only two operations currently
* supported with IOMAP_WRITE.
*/
WARN_ON(!IS_DAX(inode) && !(flags & IOMAP_DIRECT));
if (IS_DAX(inode))
flags = EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CREATE_ZERO;
else if (round_down(offset, i_blocksize(inode)) >=
i_size_read(inode)) {
flags = EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CREATE;
else if (ext4_test_inode_flag(inode, EXT4_INODE_EXTENTS))
flags = EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_IO_CREATE_EXT;
/*
* We cannot fill holes in indirect tree based inodes as that
* could expose stale data in the case of a crash. Use the
* magic error code to fallback to buffered IO.
*/
if (!flags && !ret)
ret = -ENOTBLK;
> @@ -3601,6 +3631,8 @@ static int ext4_iomap_begin(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, loff_t length,
> static int ext4_iomap_end(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, loff_t length,
> ssize_t written, unsigned flags, struct iomap *iomap)
> {
> + if (flags & IOMAP_DIRECT && written == 0)
> + return -ENOTBLK;
This probably wants a comment, too. But do we actually ever end up
here?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-12 17:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-12 12:52 [PATCH 0/5] ext4: direct IO via iomap infrastructure Matthew Bobrowski
2019-08-12 12:52 ` [PATCH 1/5] ext4: introduce direct IO read code path using " Matthew Bobrowski
2019-08-12 17:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-12 20:17 ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-08-13 10:45 ` Matthew Bobrowski
2019-08-12 12:52 ` [PATCH 2/5] ext4: move inode extension/truncate code out from ext4_iomap_end() Matthew Bobrowski
2019-08-12 17:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-13 10:46 ` Matthew Bobrowski
2019-08-28 19:59 ` Jan Kara
2019-08-28 21:54 ` Matthew Bobrowski
2019-08-29 8:18 ` Jan Kara
2019-08-12 12:53 ` [PATCH 3/5] iomap: modify ->end_io() calling convention Matthew Bobrowski
2019-08-12 17:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-13 10:43 ` Matthew Bobrowski
2019-08-12 12:53 ` [PATCH 4/5] ext4: introduce direct IO write code path using iomap infrastructure Matthew Bobrowski
2019-08-12 17:04 ` RITESH HARJANI
2019-08-13 12:58 ` Matthew Bobrowski
2019-08-13 14:35 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-08-14 9:51 ` Matthew Bobrowski
2019-08-12 17:34 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2019-08-13 10:45 ` Matthew Bobrowski
2019-08-28 20:26 ` Jan Kara
2019-08-28 22:32 ` Dave Chinner
2019-08-29 8:03 ` Jan Kara
2019-08-29 11:47 ` Matthew Bobrowski
2019-08-29 11:45 ` Matthew Bobrowski
2019-08-29 12:38 ` Jan Kara
2019-08-12 12:53 ` [PATCH 5/5] ext4: clean up redundant buffer_head direct IO code Matthew Bobrowski
2019-08-12 17:31 ` [PATCH 0/5] ext4: direct IO via iomap infrastructure RITESH HARJANI
2019-08-13 11:10 ` Matthew Bobrowski
2019-08-13 12:27 ` RITESH HARJANI
2019-08-14 9:48 ` Matthew Bobrowski
2019-08-14 11:58 ` RITESH HARJANI
2019-08-21 13:14 ` Matthew Bobrowski
2019-08-22 12:00 ` Matthew Bobrowski
2019-08-22 14:11 ` Ritesh Harjani
2019-08-24 3:18 ` Matthew Bobrowski
2019-08-24 3:55 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-08-24 23:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-27 9:52 ` Matthew Bobrowski
2019-08-28 12:05 ` Matthew Bobrowski
2019-08-28 14:27 ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2019-08-28 18:02 ` Jan Kara
2019-08-29 6:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-29 11:20 ` Matthew Bobrowski
2019-08-29 14:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-23 13:43 ` [RFC 1/1] ext4: PoC implementation of option-1 Ritesh Harjani
2019-08-23 13:49 ` Ritesh Harjani
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190812173403.GD24564@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbobrowski@mbobrowski.org \
--cc=riteshh@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).