From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4692BC2D0DF for ; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 18:06:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E974206EE for ; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 18:06:05 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1577815565; bh=5UURX5NMJixnuBVv9SIwM/xs8xOKxaUpusObUdOSWSk=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=uL1AKl8NxKv5ilH2x79O6z3zH+C5BIAMm7UlhTM8VqY1rRYUwph1RafhoYQXwVcqy x6yDyu9DzYLyzWkhSAdE0bSC8BJ56E6FQhIcC3BAuayWgI57VFC3bnjkTIgrQSrqQP BgQ7ngKtJP0U8WqAcET1rwXDqJ4Wv11DCZ6xIKlQ= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727131AbfLaSGE (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Dec 2019 13:06:04 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:44504 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726720AbfLaSGD (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Dec 2019 13:06:03 -0500 Received: from zzz.tds (h75-100-12-111.burkwi.broadband.dynamic.tds.net [75.100.12.111]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F178C206E6 for ; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 18:06:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1577815563; bh=5UURX5NMJixnuBVv9SIwM/xs8xOKxaUpusObUdOSWSk=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=mYI5lhgg+mL81vC1o7eGgMxfa/HK+61U+Y+Rk9FguyXYTbNClgvl/aFRneY12ByHz dvayy4Q1MQhsHURyG7egqUOO7hHCFfH5K8+H46NF8+cyn5fUH1x28fz8zZA4elbipH XXS3Gj9gTS+HtQYQd+yeyezKGqNaMg171q+5kSN0= From: Eric Biggers To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 6/8] ext4: remove obsolete comment from ext4_can_extents_be_merged() Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2019 12:04:42 -0600 Message-Id: <20191231180444.46586-7-ebiggers@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.24.1 In-Reply-To: <20191231180444.46586-1-ebiggers@kernel.org> References: <20191231180444.46586-1-ebiggers@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org From: Eric Biggers Support for unwritten extents was added to ext4 a long time ago, so remove a misleading comment that says they're a future feature. Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers --- fs/ext4/extents.c | 5 ----- 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c index b2dee02ed238..25e6e83cdeca 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/extents.c +++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c @@ -1715,11 +1715,6 @@ static int ext4_can_extents_be_merged(struct inode *inode, le32_to_cpu(ex2->ee_block)) return 0; - /* - * To allow future support for preallocated extents to be added - * as an RO_COMPAT feature, refuse to merge to extents if - * this can result in the top bit of ee_len being set. - */ if (ext1_ee_len + ext2_ee_len > EXT_INIT_MAX_LEN) return 0; -- 2.24.1