From: "zhangyi (F)" <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
To: <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <jack@suse.cz>, <tytso@mit.edu>, <luoshijie1@huawei.com>,
<zhangxiaoxu5@huawei.com>, <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] jbd2: move the clearing of b_modified flag to the journal_unmap_buffer()
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 21:54:59 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200211135500.40524-2-yi.zhang@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200211135500.40524-1-yi.zhang@huawei.com>
There is no need to delay the clearing of b_modified flag to the
transaction committing time when unmapping the journalled buffer, so
just move it to the journal_unmap_buffer().
Signed-off-by: zhangyi (F) <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
---
fs/jbd2/commit.c | 43 +++++++++++++++----------------------------
fs/jbd2/transaction.c | 10 ++++++----
2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/jbd2/commit.c b/fs/jbd2/commit.c
index 7f0b362b3842..ecc2ea5f1b59 100644
--- a/fs/jbd2/commit.c
+++ b/fs/jbd2/commit.c
@@ -976,34 +976,21 @@ void jbd2_journal_commit_transaction(journal_t *journal)
* it. */
/*
- * A buffer which has been freed while still being journaled by
- * a previous transaction.
- */
- if (buffer_freed(bh)) {
- /*
- * If the running transaction is the one containing
- * "add to orphan" operation (b_next_transaction !=
- * NULL), we have to wait for that transaction to
- * commit before we can really get rid of the buffer.
- * So just clear b_modified to not confuse transaction
- * credit accounting and refile the buffer to
- * BJ_Forget of the running transaction. If the just
- * committed transaction contains "add to orphan"
- * operation, we can completely invalidate the buffer
- * now. We are rather through in that since the
- * buffer may be still accessible when blocksize <
- * pagesize and it is attached to the last partial
- * page.
- */
- jh->b_modified = 0;
- if (!jh->b_next_transaction) {
- clear_buffer_freed(bh);
- clear_buffer_jbddirty(bh);
- clear_buffer_mapped(bh);
- clear_buffer_new(bh);
- clear_buffer_req(bh);
- bh->b_bdev = NULL;
- }
+ * A buffer which has been freed while still being journaled
+ * by a previous transaction, refile the buffer to BJ_Forget of
+ * the running transaction. If the just committed transaction
+ * contains "add to orphan" operation, we can completely
+ * invalidate the buffer now. We are rather through in that
+ * since the buffer may be still accessible when blocksize <
+ * pagesize and it is attached to the last partial page.
+ */
+ if (buffer_freed(bh) && !jh->b_next_transaction) {
+ clear_buffer_freed(bh);
+ clear_buffer_jbddirty(bh);
+ clear_buffer_mapped(bh);
+ clear_buffer_new(bh);
+ clear_buffer_req(bh);
+ bh->b_bdev = NULL;
}
if (buffer_jbddirty(bh)) {
diff --git a/fs/jbd2/transaction.c b/fs/jbd2/transaction.c
index 27b9f9dee434..0603dfa9ad90 100644
--- a/fs/jbd2/transaction.c
+++ b/fs/jbd2/transaction.c
@@ -2329,14 +2329,16 @@ static int journal_unmap_buffer(journal_t *journal, struct buffer_head *bh,
return -EBUSY;
}
/*
- * OK, buffer won't be reachable after truncate. We just set
- * j_next_transaction to the running transaction (if there is
- * one) and mark buffer as freed so that commit code knows it
- * should clear dirty bits when it is done with the buffer.
+ * OK, buffer won't be reachable after truncate. We just clear
+ * b_modified to not confuse transaction credit accounting, and
+ * set j_next_transaction to the running transaction (if there
+ * is one) and mark buffer as freed so that commit code knows
+ * it should clear dirty bits when it is done with the buffer.
*/
set_buffer_freed(bh);
if (journal->j_running_transaction && buffer_jbddirty(bh))
jh->b_next_transaction = journal->j_running_transaction;
+ jh->b_modified = 0;
spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock);
spin_unlock(&jh->b_state_lock);
write_unlock(&journal->j_state_lock);
--
2.17.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-11 13:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-11 13:54 [PATCH v2 0/2] jbd2: fix an oops problem zhangyi (F)
2020-02-11 13:54 ` zhangyi (F) [this message]
2020-02-12 10:45 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] jbd2: move the clearing of b_modified flag to the journal_unmap_buffer() Jan Kara
2020-02-11 13:55 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] jbd2: do not clear the BH_Mapped flag when forgetting a metadata buffer zhangyi (F)
2020-02-12 10:48 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200211135500.40524-2-yi.zhang@huawei.com \
--to=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luoshijie1@huawei.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=zhangxiaoxu5@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).