linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, "zhangyi (F)" <yi.zhang@huawei.com>,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca,
	zhangxiaoxu5@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] ext4: fix inconsistency since reading old metadata from disk
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 18:27:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200610162715.GD20677@quack2.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200610154543.GI1347934@mit.edu>

On Wed 10-06-20 11:45:43, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 11:57:39AM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > So I guess it may still lead to inconsistency. How about add this checking
> > > into ext4_journal_get_write_access() ?
> > 
> > Yes, this also occured to me later. Adding the check to
> > ext4_journal_get_write_access() should be safer.
> 
> There's another thing which we could do.  One of the issues is that we
> allow buffered writeback for block devices once the change to the
> block has been committed.  What if we add a change to block device
> writeback code and in fs/buffer.c so that optionally, the file system
> can specify a callback function can get called when an I/O error has
> been reflected back up from the block layer?
> 
> It seems unfortunate that currently, we can immediately report the I/O
> error for buffered writes to *files*, but for metadata blocks, we
> would only be able to report the problem when we next try to modify
> it.
> 
> Making changes to fs/buffer.c might be controversial, but I think it
> might be result in a better solution.

Yeah, what you propose certainly makes sence could be relatively easily
done by blkdev_writepage() using __block_write_full_page() with appropriate
endio handler which calls fs callback. I'm just not sure how propagate the
callback function from the fs to the blkdev...

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR

  reply	other threads:[~2020-06-10 16:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-26  7:17 [PATCH 00/10] ext4: fix inconsistency since reading old metadata from disk zhangyi (F)
2020-05-26  7:17 ` [PATCH 01/10] ext4: move inode eio simulation behind io completeion zhangyi (F)
2020-05-26  7:17 ` [PATCH 02/10] fs: pick out ll_rw_one_block() helper function zhangyi (F)
2020-05-28  5:07   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-28 13:23     ` zhangyi (F)
2020-05-26  7:17 ` [PATCH 03/10] ext4: add ext4_sb_getblk*() wrapper functions zhangyi (F)
2020-05-26  7:17 ` [PATCH 04/10] ext4: replace sb_getblk() with ext4_sb_getblk_locked() zhangyi (F)
2020-05-26  7:17 ` [PATCH 05/10] ext4: replace sb_bread*() with ext4_sb_bread*() zhangyi (F)
2020-05-26  7:17 ` [PATCH 06/10] ext4: replace sb_getblk() with ext4_sb_getblk() zhangyi (F)
2020-05-26  7:17 ` [PATCH 07/10] ext4: switch to use ext4_sb_getblk_locked() in ext4_getblk() zhangyi (F)
2020-05-26  7:17 ` [PATCH 08/10] ext4: replace sb_breadahead() with ext4_sb_breadahead() zhangyi (F)
2020-05-26  7:17 ` [PATCH 09/10] ext4: abort the filesystem while freeing the write error io buffer zhangyi (F)
2020-05-26  7:17 ` [PATCH 10/10] ext4: remove unused parameter in jbd2_journal_try_to_free_buffers() zhangyi (F)
2020-06-08  3:32 ` [PATCH 00/10] ext4: fix inconsistency since reading old metadata from disk zhangyi (F)
2020-06-08  8:20 ` Jan Kara
2020-06-08 14:39   ` zhangyi (F)
2020-06-09 12:19     ` Jan Kara
2020-06-10  8:55       ` zhangyi (F)
2020-06-10  9:57         ` Jan Kara
2020-06-10 15:45           ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2020-06-10 16:27             ` Jan Kara [this message]
2020-06-11  2:12               ` zhangyi (F)
2020-06-11  8:21                 ` Jan Kara
2020-06-11 16:55                   ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2020-06-12 11:13                     ` zhangyi (F)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200610162715.GD20677@quack2.suse.cz \
    --to=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
    --cc=zhangxiaoxu5@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).