From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira <mfo@canonical.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
dann frazier <dann.frazier@canonical.com>,
Mauricio Faria de Oliveira <mauricio.foliveira@gmail.com>,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 3/5] ext4: data=journal: write-protect pages on submit inode data buffers callback
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 12:41:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200819104139.GJ1902@quack2.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200819084421.GD1902@quack2.suse.cz>
On Wed 19-08-20 10:44:21, Jan Kara wrote:
> I was thinking about this and we may need to do this somewhat differently.
> I've realized that there's the slight trouble that we now use page dirty
> bit for two purposes in data=journal mode - to track pages that need write
> protection during commit and also to track pages which have buffers that
> need checkpointing. And this mixing is making things complex. So I was
> thinking that we could simply leave PageDirty bit for checkpointing
> purposes and always make sure buffers are appropriately attached to a
> transaction as dirty in ext4_page_mkwrite(). This will make mmap writes in
> data=journal mode somewhat less efficient (all the pages written through
> mmap while transaction T was running will be written to the journal during
> transaction T commit while currently, we write only pages that also went
> through __ext4_journalled_writepage() while T was running which usually
> happens less frequently). But the code should be simpler and we don't care
> about mmap write performance for data=journal mode much. Furthermore I
> don't think that the tricks with PageChecked logic we play in data=journal
> mode are really needed as well which should bring further simplifications.
> I'll try to code this cleanup.
I was looking more into this but it isn't as simple as I thought because
get_user_pages() users can still modify data and call set_page_dirty() when
the page is no longer writeably mapped. And by the time set_page_dirty() is
called page buffers are not necessarily part of any transaction so we need
to do effectively what's in ext4_journalled_writepage(). To handle this
corner case I didn't find anything considerably simpler than the current
code.
So let's stay with what we have in
ext4_journalled_submit_inode_data_buffers(), we just have to also redirty
the page if we find any dirty buffers.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-19 10:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-10 1:02 [RFC PATCH v2 0/5] ext4/jbd2: data=journal: write-protect pages on transaction commit Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
2020-08-10 1:02 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/5] jbd2: test case for ext4 data=journal/mmap() journal corruption Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
2020-08-18 14:38 ` Jan Kara
2020-08-19 1:15 ` Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
2020-08-10 1:02 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/5] jbd2: introduce journal callbacks j_submit|finish_inode_data_buffers Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
2020-08-18 14:52 ` Jan Kara
2020-08-19 1:20 ` Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
2020-08-19 9:16 ` Jan Kara
2020-08-10 1:02 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/5] ext4: data=journal: write-protect pages on submit inode data buffers callback Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
2020-08-19 8:44 ` Jan Kara
2020-08-19 10:41 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2020-08-20 22:55 ` Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
2020-08-21 10:26 ` Jan Kara
2020-08-10 1:02 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/5] ext4: data=journal: add inode to transaction inode list in ext4_page_mkwrite() Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
2020-08-10 1:02 ` [RFC PATCH v2 5/5] ext4/jbd2: debugging messages Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
2020-08-19 8:46 ` Jan Kara
2020-08-10 1:02 ` [RFC PATCH v2/SETUP SCRIPT] Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
2020-08-10 1:02 ` [RFC PATCH v2/TEST CASE] Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
2020-08-19 9:27 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/5] ext4/jbd2: data=journal: write-protect pages on transaction commit Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200819104139.GJ1902@quack2.suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=dann.frazier@canonical.com \
--cc=jack@suse.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mauricio.foliveira@gmail.com \
--cc=mfo@canonical.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).