From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>, Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 07/21] ext4: correctly restore system zone info when remount fails
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 12:38:31 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200824163845.606933-7-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200824163845.606933-1-sashal@kernel.org>
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
[ Upstream commit 0f5bde1db174f6c471f0bd27198575719dabe3e5 ]
When remounting filesystem fails late during remount handling and
block_validity mount option is also changed during the remount, we fail
to restore system zone information to a state matching the mount option.
This is mostly harmless, just the block validity checking will not match
the situation described by the mount option. Make sure these two are always
consistent.
Reported-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200728130437.7804-7-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
fs/ext4/block_validity.c | 8 --------
fs/ext4/super.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++--------
2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/block_validity.c b/fs/ext4/block_validity.c
index d203cc935ff83..9d5a6bc98a71a 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/block_validity.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/block_validity.c
@@ -260,14 +260,6 @@ int ext4_setup_system_zone(struct super_block *sb)
int flex_size = ext4_flex_bg_size(sbi);
int ret;
- if (!test_opt(sb, BLOCK_VALIDITY)) {
- if (sbi->system_blks)
- ext4_release_system_zone(sb);
- return 0;
- }
- if (sbi->system_blks)
- return 0;
-
system_blks = kzalloc(sizeof(*system_blks), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!system_blks)
return -ENOMEM;
diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
index daabd7a2cee81..9ac34b6ae0731 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/super.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
@@ -4473,11 +4473,13 @@ static int ext4_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
ext4_set_resv_clusters(sb);
- err = ext4_setup_system_zone(sb);
- if (err) {
- ext4_msg(sb, KERN_ERR, "failed to initialize system "
- "zone (%d)", err);
- goto failed_mount4a;
+ if (test_opt(sb, BLOCK_VALIDITY)) {
+ err = ext4_setup_system_zone(sb);
+ if (err) {
+ ext4_msg(sb, KERN_ERR, "failed to initialize system "
+ "zone (%d)", err);
+ goto failed_mount4a;
+ }
}
ext4_ext_init(sb);
@@ -5470,9 +5472,16 @@ static int ext4_remount(struct super_block *sb, int *flags, char *data)
ext4_register_li_request(sb, first_not_zeroed);
}
- err = ext4_setup_system_zone(sb);
- if (err)
- goto restore_opts;
+ /*
+ * Handle creation of system zone data early because it can fail.
+ * Releasing of existing data is done when we are sure remount will
+ * succeed.
+ */
+ if (test_opt(sb, BLOCK_VALIDITY) && !sbi->system_blks) {
+ err = ext4_setup_system_zone(sb);
+ if (err)
+ goto restore_opts;
+ }
if (sbi->s_journal == NULL && !(old_sb_flags & SB_RDONLY)) {
err = ext4_commit_super(sb, 1);
@@ -5494,6 +5503,8 @@ static int ext4_remount(struct super_block *sb, int *flags, char *data)
}
}
#endif
+ if (!test_opt(sb, BLOCK_VALIDITY) && sbi->system_blks)
+ ext4_release_system_zone(sb);
/*
* Some options can be enabled by ext4 and/or by VFS mount flag
@@ -5515,6 +5526,8 @@ static int ext4_remount(struct super_block *sb, int *flags, char *data)
sbi->s_commit_interval = old_opts.s_commit_interval;
sbi->s_min_batch_time = old_opts.s_min_batch_time;
sbi->s_max_batch_time = old_opts.s_max_batch_time;
+ if (!test_opt(sb, BLOCK_VALIDITY) && sbi->system_blks)
+ ext4_release_system_zone(sb);
#ifdef CONFIG_QUOTA
sbi->s_jquota_fmt = old_opts.s_jquota_fmt;
for (i = 0; i < EXT4_MAXQUOTAS; i++) {
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-24 16:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-24 16:38 [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 01/21] jbd2: make sure jh have b_transaction set in refile/unfile_buffer Sasha Levin
2020-08-24 16:38 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 02/21] ext4: don't BUG on inconsistent journal feature Sasha Levin
2020-08-24 16:38 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 03/21] ext4: handle read only external journal device Sasha Levin
2020-08-24 16:38 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 04/21] jbd2: abort journal if free a async write error metadata buffer Sasha Levin
2020-08-24 16:38 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 05/21] ext4: handle option set by mount flags correctly Sasha Levin
2020-08-24 16:38 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 06/21] ext4: handle error of ext4_setup_system_zone() on remount Sasha Levin
2020-08-24 16:38 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2020-08-24 16:38 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 08/21] fs: prevent BUG_ON in submit_bh_wbc() Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200824163845.606933-7-sashal@kernel.org \
--to=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=lczerner@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).