From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Constantine Sapuntzakis <costa@purestorage.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, jack@suse.cz, tytso@mit.edu,
adilger.kernel@dilger.ca
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: Fix superblock checksum calculation race
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 10:54:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200914085427.GC4863@quack2.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200911211603.5653-1-costa@purestorage.com>
On Fri 11-09-20 15:16:03, Constantine Sapuntzakis wrote:
> The race condition could cause the persisted superblock checksum
> to not match the contents of the superblock, causing the
> superblock to be considered corrupt.
>
> An example of the race follows. A first thread is interrupted in the
> middle of a checksum calculation. Then, another thread changes the
> superblock, calculates a new checksum, and sets it. Then, the first
> thread resumes and sets the checksum based on the older superblock.
>
> To fix, serialize the superblock checksum calculation using the buffer
> header lock. While a spinlock is sufficient, the buffer header is
> already there and there is precedent for locking it (e.g. in
> ext4_commit_super).
>
> Tested the patch by booting up a kernel with the patch, creating
> a filesystem and some files (including some orphans), and then
> unmounting and remounting the file system.
>
> Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Thanks for the patch! Please add your Signed-off-by line to the patch to
certify that you've written the patch and agree with it being included in
the kernel (see "Developer's Certificate of Origin 1.1" in
Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for more details). Without it
the patch cannot be included. Otherwise it looks good so feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Thanks
Honza
> ---
> fs/ext4/super.c | 11 +++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
> index ea425b49b345..3f7fdce5ab05 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/super.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
> @@ -201,7 +201,18 @@ void ext4_superblock_csum_set(struct super_block *sb)
> if (!ext4_has_metadata_csum(sb))
> return;
>
> + /*
> + * Locking the superblock prevents the scenario
> + * where:
> + * 1) a first thread pauses during checksum calculation.
> + * 2) a second thread updates the superblock, recalculates
> + * the checksum, and updates s_checksum
> + * 3) the first thread resumes and finishes its checksum calculation
> + * and updates s_checksum with a potentially stale or torn value.
> + */
> + lock_buffer(EXT4_SB(sb)->s_sbh);
> es->s_checksum = ext4_superblock_csum(sb, es);
> + unlock_buffer(EXT4_SB(sb)->s_sbh);
> }
>
> ext4_fsblk_t ext4_block_bitmap(struct super_block *sb,
> --
> 2.17.1
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-14 8:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-11 21:16 [PATCH] ext4: Fix superblock checksum calculation race Constantine Sapuntzakis
2020-09-14 8:54 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2020-09-14 16:10 ` Constantine Sapuntzakis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200914085427.GC4863@quack2.suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=costa@purestorage.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox